That’s the point though. Sea Lion is an objective for Germany but there is no justification for doing while the USSR is still a credible threat because once you capture London, there is no way in hell you can defend against the US liberation and the Soviet invasion. Hence, just don’t do it. I am only suggesting that if one wanted to do an early Sea Lion, you will need Japan to put so much pressure on USSR that Germany can focus completely on US thus Japan will lose in the Pacific. I agree Sea Lion isn’t a wise move.
Why should Japan attack at turn 1?
-
Hi,
i watched some videos on youtube and some people suggest an attack on USA at turn 1.
Why should you do it? It gives USA +25 income. Japan got some problems with chinese infantry. And the british / anzac are at war with you. It looks like its only negative side.
Can you help me?:confused: -
Hi @faruu
It’s discussed some here
https://www.axisandallies.org/forums/topic/17005/the-japan-playbook?page=1 -
Exactly! That’s why I always wait for a declaration of war. Attacking first caused Japan to lose in real life.
-
F Faruu deleted this topic on
-
P Panther restored this topic on
Suggested Topics
