@theveteran hopefully there’s a little more clarity in v4
Best posts made by Jon B
-
RE: Declaration or war during an opponent’s non-combat movement
-
RE: Seaplanes
@sjelso that was kind of my thought. Useful for gaps in the convoy lines and cornering subs.
-
RE: Surrounding a city question
@didier_de_dax thanks, he sees the light finally.
-
RE: Join the ABGB discord: Much more GW36 activity is found there.
Can you refresh the link please? Much appreciated
Latest posts made by Jon B
-
RE: Join the ABGB discord: Much more GW36 activity is found there.
Can you refresh the link please? Much appreciated
-
RE: Declaration or war during an opponent’s non-combat movement
@theveteran hopefully there’s a little more clarity in v4
-
RE: Declaration or war during an opponent’s non-combat movement
@insanehoshi interesting. Thanks for the insight!
-
RE: Declaration or war during an opponent’s non-combat movement
@insanehoshi I think I get it lol. Would the British fleet have to stop in the sea zone with the Italian ships when the declaration of war is made?
Another thought, if the British are making a combat move through the sea zone of the neutral Italians, but the Italians end up declaring war, wouldn’t the move of the British into that sea zone now be considered a combat move since the ships are entering a hostile sea zone?
-
RE: Declaration or war during an opponent’s non-combat movement
@insanehoshi Ahh ok, that’s what I was looking for. So let’s say my original scenario is taking part in the combat phase rather than the non-combat phase. Does this rule apply as well or would combat actually occur?
-
RE: Declaration or war during an opponent’s non-combat movement
@trig yah that makes sense. Thanks for the reply
-
Declaration or war during an opponent’s non-combat movement
Let’s say on Britain’s non-combat move they move ships through a sea zone with Italian ships already present. Italy decides to declare war at the moment. Does combat occur even though it’s a non-combat move? If so, is Italy the attacker or the defender? I wasn’t able to find anything in the rules regarding this.
Thanks!
-
RE: Surrounding a city question
@chris_henry for sure! One of the many reasons I enjoy this game so much
-
RE: Surrounding a city question
@didier_de_dax thanks, he sees the light finally.
-
Surrounding a city question
Using Kiev as an example- can the Germans, in the same move, strat bomb the airbase, blitz and surround the city with a small portion of their force, then attack the city itself with remaining forces giving the city defenders the -1 penalty? I would imagine so since the attacker gets to choose the order of his battles. My opponent disagrees. Thoughts?