Plastic Playing Pieces

To repeat my original complaint, $100 should NOT = crappy plastic pieces.  If they’d at least provided the quality of AAR, I’d have been OKAY with it, if not thrilled.  But these pieces suck worse than AAR pieces, and that’s saying something, since AAR pieces were definitely a downgrade from AAE and AAP.  If it’s a 50th Anniversary Edition (50th anniversary of the founding of Avalon Hill, by the way), why should I care if the quality is the WORST it’s been in those 50 years?

TG Moses VI…  waited your life for the game?

There are 600 or so pieces.  If they were made out of a more expensive material, the game would have cost much more.

The game is great as is.

My biggest gripes about the cheapness is that in the cover of the OOB rules it goes on and on about how they wanted a game that would be the cats meow.

In Pacific the US had Hellcats and P-38’s for fighters out of the box.  The only thing that sets these pieces apart is light brown, moderate brown, heavy brown and burnt brown.

@Gamer:

To repeat my original complaint, $100 should NOT = crappy plastic pieces.  If they’d at least provided the quality of AAR, I’d have been OKAY with it, if not thrilled.  But these pieces suck worse that AAR pieces, and that’s saying something, since AAR pieces were definitely a downgrade from AAE and AAP.  If it’s a 50th Anniversary Edition (50th anniversary of the founding of Avalon Hill, by the way), why should I care if the quality is the WORST it’s been in those 50 years?

I agree “the quality is the WORST it’s been in those 50 years!”

@Gallo:

uhm… I’m just curious:

what naval, air, and land units does AA Pacific, Europe, Guadalcanal, D-Day, and Battle of the Bugle represent? Is there much change?

I know that US fighters for AA Pacific are Hellcats (or maybe Wildcats?).

German bomber ( only 1 ! ) from the Bulge is a Ju88, in AA50 bombers’ type is Heinkel 111

@Gamer:

To repeat my original complaint, $100 should NOT = crappy plastic pieces.  If they’d at least provided the quality of AAR, I’d have been OKAY with it, if not thrilled.  But these pieces suck worse that AAR pieces, and that’s saying something, since AAR pieces were definitely a downgrade from AAE and AAP.  If it’s a 50th Anniversary Edition (50th anniversary of the founding of Avalon Hill, by the way), why should I care if the quality is the WORST it’s been in those 50 years?

I repeat my question… what sucks about the pieces?  I didn’t get my copy…

They are fine!

Don’t worry about it!!!

They aren’t bent nor deformed, but the colors are too similar for those color deficient persons.

Just play the game and enjoy!!

My goodness what a bunch of whiners!

@Constantinople:

They are fine!

Don’t worry about it!!!

They aren’t bent nor deformed, but the colors are too similar for those color deficient persons.

Just play the game and enjoy!!

My goodness what a bunch of whiners!

As IL and others stated earlier, for a “normal” game, the lack of quality is understandable.
For a $100 bucks, special, anniversary, SUPER DE LUXE edition…it’s not.

And can I have some french bread with my wine please?

One of the reasons this this version is (probably) too expensive for me is the repeats yet again of units I already have more than enough of and (if the above posts are true) of better quality.

I’d definately have bought the game if it’d been also sold in an “expansion” form with ONLY the pieces unique to this version.
Given that the vast majority of potential buyers also have stacks of German infantry, UK Bombers etc why didn’t they just include the new pieces and board and keep down the costs? I’d probably have bought two sets for the new stuff, instead of which I’ll probably buy none.

Mind, they’d have to have made the Italian pieces in grey…

I have a few USA INF that lean to far and they will not stand up.
1 Russian is decapitated.
1 Ger bomber has 1 wing shorter than the other.
a lot of pcs are showing white where the mold was connected.

It is not all pcs, just a few.

2 CA for Italy.  Larry gave you an extra one.

Man, if you guys were settling the West, you would never have gotten past New York City!

Heck, not even past Boston……    :-D

I can hear it now:  “The wagon is dirty, the food has maggots, there are Indians out there, we have to actually camp out!!???, I did not sign up for this. For $2 we don’t get silverware, steaks, a bed and 4 square meals?  Who do I complain to??”

Is there anything else to complain about?

Surely there must be more you can find in that big box to whine about!!

Look, if any of you have buyer’s regret, why don’t you donate the game to your local community center or high school game club or better yet pack up your awful pieces and send them to me!!

I’d be happy to take them off your hands!!  :lol:

It is a game folks!! Enjoy it!!

i don’t think you seem to understand, Con. , that people are only expecting better because this game is:

a) expensive

and b) supposedly this is a special edition to mark the 50th anniversary of AH

if this was just another version worth $60 or so, then no worries

maybe someone can come up with some kind of petition we can all sign, then send off to wizards? worth a try anyway

–------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I was missing the IC’s and AA guns from my box.  i called, they said they would send.  now i need to look at all pieces to make sure they are good.

i cant wait to play the game.

it’s not all about esthetics. it’s that there are defective parts i’d be happier if I had some cardboard counters or the MB edition generic pieces.

and yes 100 dollars is expensive.

While we are talking about the pieces, does anyone have a positive ID on the Soviet bomber used in AA:50? I was thinking it might be a Petlyakov Pe-8, but the wingspan doesn’t really match the Pe-8.

@MP84:

While we are talking about the pieces, does anyone have a positive ID on the Soviet bomber used in AA:50? I was thinking it might be a Petlyakov Pe-8, but the wingspan doesn’t really match the Pe-8.

Talking about the russian bomber, what is the stuff it has attached under the wings ?

@MP84:

While we are talking about the pieces, does anyone have a positive ID on the Soviet bomber used in AA:50? I was thinking it might be a Petlyakov Pe-8, but the wingspan doesn’t really match the Pe-8.

Yes, that’s what it’s supposed to be.