This only works if there are only Italian aricraft scrambling. I usually use two fighters from the United Kingdom terirtory, and the fighter from Malta-the fighter from Girbraltar should be used along with the cruiser off of Girbraltar (it takes three submarines to have more than an 80% chance to kill it, my normal standard to win a battle, so the submarines are usually used for easier prey in the north, especially if Germany attacks the Soviet Union in the first turn, which will nessecitate one submarine in sea zone 125) to destroy the Italian navy off of Malta. If a German aircraft lands in Southern Italy, I usually will call of the attack, as there is a less than 80% chance to win. All of this assumes Germany invades the Soviet Union in the first turn.
Free French Blue Fighter Aircraft
-
Do you sometimes explicitly spare it from scrambling on G1 to use it later for other purposes?
Of course if the odds are good, scramble. But is it always just no scramble vs full scramble?
I have also experienced the annoyance that plane can cause for the axis…
-
Of course if the odds are good, scramble. But is it always just no scramble vs full scramble?
I’m yet to see a case where a partial scramble makes sense.
-
Of course if the odds are good, scramble. But is it always just no scramble vs full scramble?
I’m yet to see a case where a partial scramble makes sense.
Fair enough,
follow up:If you do a full scramble, do you always sacrifice the french fighter before the uk fighters?
Basically the question behind the question: Is the french fighter more worthy than the uk ones because it has some unique usecases?
-
If you do a full scramble, do you always sacrifice the french fighter before the uk fighters?
Basically the question behind the question: Is the french fighter more worthy than the uk ones because it has some unique usecases?
UK realistically needs 1 fighter to send down on the Taranto raid.
-
UK realistically needs 1 fighter to send down on the Taranto raid.
yeah, haven’t thought about that.
Then let’s say the german has only enough hits to kill one fighter.
I want to know if it’s an automatism to always kill the french fighter first. I think I’ve seen that a lot, but this thread keeps me questioning :-)
-
Just a thought: what if you land the french fighter on a US carrier in the Pacific? It will take two turns to get there, but it might work out nicely instead of using an ANZAC fighter to kill lonely Japanese transports.
Move US carrier forward and in the French turn fly of to kill. -
I would sacrifice the French fighter first. The Scottish fighter can reach Taranto.
-
Correct, it makes a hell more sense for the Free French Airforce to be destroyed over London than a British one.
-
I would sacrifice the French fighter first. The Scottish fighter can reach Taranto.
@Caesar:
Correct, it makes a hell more sense for the Free French Airforce to be destroyed over London than a British one.
But isn’t the consensus of this thread that the french fighter has some unique applications?
-
I would sacrifice the French fighter first. The Scottish fighter can reach Taranto.
@Caesar:
Correct, it makes a hell more sense for the Free French Airforce to be destroyed over London than a British one.
But isn’t the consensus of this thread that the french fighter has some unique applications?
The only advantage it has is that you can take it anywhere you need an extra fighter for defense without paying for it.
-
I guess its only unique application is its after Italy but before Germany. Not a frequently useful window of opportunity.
If you wait until after G2 so you know no Sea Lion, the fighter can be in Moscow or Calcutta before G6/J6
-
I guess its only unique application is its after Italy but before Germany. Not a frequently useful window of opportunity.
If you wait until after G2 so you know no Sea Lion, the fighter can be in Moscow or Calcutta before G6/J6
Mostly my French Fighter ends up in Egypt.
Suggested Topics
