A New Youtube Channel Worth Your Time!

@thethedew I don’t own the game, but I think the main point of it is that it is not WW2 based. This way the game has appeal to people who aren’t that interested in WW2.

Let us know what you think after you’ve played a couple of games.

@The-Captain

Nice. Very ambitious. I wish you the best of luck.

@tincanofthesea

Sure hope they all are. D-Day’s not too expensive though, that was reprinted some time ago. But not forking hundreds of dollars for one board game. Sure wish Guandacanal and Battle of the Bulge were on TripleA.

@barnee Sorry to disturb you but do you have a reason why Guandacanal and Battle of the Bulge are not on TripleA? Thank you!

@midnight_reaper

Thanks for the information.

Next week, I’ll check with the shops in Denmark, in which we by our games, to figure out their supply situation.

Captain

@zooooma I see no indication of anything even remotely about AA games, but more fantasy titles being worked on which is typical of WOTC. they choked the life out of Avalon Hill until it was dead. They could care less about anything remotely Historical and only deal in FANTASY. Nothing but a bunch of fat slobs with pimples rolling for hobgoblins, etc.

I’d better get the new forum up and running.  :wink:

This is awesome news!

Will AAE40 & AAP40 have the same rules as AA50 in terms of:

transports

submarines

prices

Between A&A (MB), AAE, AAP and Revised, we had four different sets of rules for transports and likewise for submarines.  :?   
It was okay when I owned all four and used to play all the time.  But for people who don’t play that often or who won’t own all of AA50, AA42, AAP40, and AAE40, it would really help to comfortably go from one game to the next if the basic rules are standardized.

Here’s hoping.