I’m currently mulling over the issue of how the “old BB’s” that HBG is producing ought to be used. Forgive me if the following seems a little disjointed, but they are a collection of thoughts all related to this issue, which didn’t seem to fit neatly on any other thread…
“Old BB’s” as used by nearly all of the naval powers of the day were tremendously more powerful that heavy cruisers, so IL’s 3/3/2 doesn’t seem to me to do them justice. (See First Naval Battle of Guadalcanal, Friday 13th 11/1942; it took a whole flotilla of cruisers to head off a force of 2 Japanese “old BB’s”… and there wasn’t much left of the US force afterwards. What’s more, even the biggest Japanese loss, an old BB or Battlecruiser, wasn’t sunk but had to be finished off by aircraft, so it would probably have been saved if the US hadn’t controlled the neighboring island with its airfield.) We’re talking 12"-16" guns in nearly all cases and ships 3x the size of a CA.
Also, most old BB’s had been extensively modernized; depending on the degree to which this was true, the only real capability gap was generally just speed and fuel efficiency. (Lack of fuel efficiency was actually the main reason why the US didn’t bring any of its old BB’s to Guadalcanal.) Can speed be used as a differentiator between ships without messing up the game balance? If so, is it better done by making the fast ships a 3 movement or the slow ships a 1?
One more thought: I noticed that the Holstein BB was recently added to the list for the early-war German set… is it too early to change this? The Holstein class is a pre-dreadnought, not anywhere close to the capability of the dreadnought BB’s that even the oldest BB’s fielded by the other powers would have. Though they weren’t that “old”, I still think the Scharnhorst would be a better fit. Note that while it had good armor, its 11" guns put it in a similar category overall with, say, an updated Nevada or a rebuilt Andrea Doria. The French Dunkerque, with its 13" guns and somewhat thin armor would be an equally good choice for a French “old BB,” even though technically not that old… plus you’d be throwing a bone to those of us who’d rather have a line-up of new CB’s than old BB’s anyway… but anyway, even as an “old BB”, Holstein is a mis-fit, considerably below not only old BB’s and new CB’s in capability, but even the German pocket BB’s in capability (note that the Pocket BB’s were actually built to replace German pre-dreanoughts.)