@JimmyHat:
indeed, its almost like you were so in to taking London you didn’t even type out the battles! I was reading your post and had to figure out what you were attacking with, but not what was defending. I would think it would be nice to add 1 line: Germ 4 inf 4 arm 3 ftr 1 tac vs. UK 5 inf 3 ftr aa
Apologies, I was in a rush because you two were sounding impatient with waiting. Keep in mind I have papers to grade, quizzes to write and lesson plans to plan as well.
13 Infantry, 4 Fighters defending, correct?
Sim: http://www.dskelly.com/misc/aa/aasim.html
So I’d have to alter course, which is fine, since I didn’t originally plan a round 2 attack of England.
Germany would probably go along the lines of 7 Transports, 4 Armor, Artillery with units moving to W. Germany.
Landing 5 ground units and an AA Gun in Scotland.
(Not looking at the map, if I need an airbase in Norway and some aircraft there to protect the new transports then trade in 3 armor for it and get an infantry as well.)
@JimmyHat:
Well Jim is running this strategic experiment. I believe the consensus is though a G4 sealion is unavoidably successful, we are trying to find a way to make G3 sealion a no-go. If you have any strategic insights or moves that might go missed don’t hesitate to interject.
THought we were trying to derail a G4 sea lion? That’s when I go with Sea Lion, why am I even in this discussion on G3 Sea Lion? lol.
Never mind then! I don’t WANT a G3 Sea Lion, it brings America into the war sooner and your odds are significantly less than a G4 sea lion!