Re: Field Marshal Games Pieces Project Discussion thread


  • Soviet Union
    Infantry 1: with rifle at 3/4 position of body advancing
    Infantry 2: Helmet with PPSh-41 submachine gun
    Artllery: Katyusha BM-13
    Mech: T-60( Russia didn’t have any haftracks cept the ones the US gave it so a light tank is best)
    Tank 1: KV-1
    Tank 2: SU series
    Fighter: Yak-9
    Bomber: PETLYAKOV PE-8 HEAVY BOMBER

    Germany
    Infantry 1: Has standard issue rifle
    Infantry 2: Has MP40 or FG42
    Artillery: Nebelwefer
    Mech: Sdkfz 251
    Tank 1: Panzer III
    Tank 2: Panzer IV or Tiger I
    Fighter: ME262(yes this is a jet fighter, but besides the Ju 87 and Me 109 Germany had no other “commonly” recognizible planes except this one)
    Bomber: Heinkel no doubt about this choice

    United Kingdom
    Infantry 1: classic 8th army flat helmit with sten submachinegun
    Infantry 2: with lend-lease tommygun
    Artillery: Sexton 25 pounder SP
    Mech: Universal Carrier
    Tank 1: Crusader
    Tank 2: Churchill
    Fighter: Hawker Hurricane
    Bomber: Vickers Wellington

    Japan
    Infantry: bandana and flag hanging from rifle advancing
    Infantry: classic japanese marine with helmit
    Artilery: Type 4 Ho-Ro ( I call it the Ha Ro  cheesy)
    Mech: Type 1 Ho-Ha
    Tank 1: Type 89 Otsu
    Tank 2: Type 97 Chi-Ha
    Fighter: Kate ( no doubt about this choice)
    Bomber: Mitsubishi Ki-30

    United States
    Infantry 1: The M1 Garand
    Infantry 2: Thompson or BAR
    Artillery: Jackson tank destroyer
    Mech: M3 Halftrack
    Tank 1: M3 Stuart
    Tank 2: Pershing M26
    Fighter: P-51
    Bomber: B-17 B-29


  • Soviet Union
    Infantry 1: with rifle at 3/4 position of body advancing and helmetless
    Infantry 2: Helmet with PPSh-41 submachine gun with 35 round box magazine
    Artllery: Katyusha BM-13
    Mech: T-60
    Tank 1: KV-1
    Tank 2: SU-100 or -122(I like this choice too)
    Fighter: The Il-2 is like the soveits’s stuka so even though it is not technically a fighter I thought we should have it, if not i guess the Yak-9 is ok.
    Bomber: PETLYAKOV PE-8 HEAVY BOMBER, ok

    Germany
    Infantry 1: He should have a panzerfaust, it was a very common weapon, plus it is boring if every just has a rifle or machinegun.
    Infantry 2: Has MP40 or FG42 in fallschrimjager uniform
    Artillery: Nebelwefer, or Hummel if this is too much of a late war weapon
    Mech: Sdkfz 251
    Tank 1: Panzer II, all of the panzer’s are cool but this one would be good in a A&A or WWII game that had an earleir start date that 1941 and even after that, in Russia, especailly’ in the initail invasion these tanks were quite numerous.
    Tank 2: Panzer IV or Tiger I
    Fighter: ME262, if not this ithkrall’s FW190 suggestion would be the next choice
    Bomber: Heinkel He 177?

    United Kingdom
    Infantry 1: classic 8th army flat helmit with Bren gun
    Infantry 2: Paratooper with  Beret and sten gun
    Artillery: Sexton 25 pounder SP
    Mech: Universal Carrier
    Tank 1: Crusader
    Tank 2: Churchill
    Fighter: Hawker Hurricane
    Bomber: Vickers Wellington

    Japan
    Infantry: bandana and flag hanging from rifle advancing( can I see a picture of this?)
    Infantry: Why not a winter soldeir?
    Artilery: Type 4 Ho-Ro
    Mech: Type 1 Ho-Ha
    Tank 1: Type 89 Otsu
    Tank 2: Type 97 Chi-Ha
    Fighter: Kate, this is good it kind looks like the Ann, but thats fine becasue one is a torpedo bomber and the other is a light bomber
    Bomber: Mitsubishi Ki-30 “Ann”

    United States
    Infantry 1:  Marine holding M1 carbine
    Infantry 2: Regular GI with  Thompson or BAR
    Artillery: Jackson tank destroyer( I understand, but why not a real self-proppeled artilery peice as opposed to a tank destroyer)
    Mech: M3 Halftrack
    Tank 1: M3 Stuart
    Tank 2: Pershing M26
    Fighter: P-51
    Bomber: B-29, I have enough B-17s

    my changes


  • Heinkel He 111

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heinkel_He_111

    best looking bomber


  • I agree, it is sexy, but it is not a heavy bomber and I would like to see a He 177 becasue it was the only German heavy bomber produced on a large scale.


  • I would like to add my voice to the B-25 for the USA.  I would love to see the P-51 but I wouldn’t mind seeing the Corsair for the carriers instead.  I’d also like to see one infantry piece (maybe in a later offering) that is an officer.  As for the artillery pieces, lets stick with actual artillery instead of some of the anti-tank guns.  Most A&A arty pieces are already anti-tank guns anyway except for the German flak gun, which was used as both an AA weapon and in direct fire mode, not as a real artillery piece either.

    Keep going FMG.  We’re pulling for you!


  • @dinosaur:

    I would like to add my voice to the B-25 for the USA.  I would love to see the P-51 but I wouldn’t mind seeing the Corsair for the carriers instead.  I’d also like to see one infantry piece (maybe in a later offering) that is an officer.  As for the artillery pieces, lets stick with actual artillery instead of some of the anti-tank guns.  Most A&A arty pieces are already anti-tank guns anyway except for the German flak gun, which was used as both an AA weapon and in direct fire mode, not as a real artillery piece either.

    Keep going FMG.  We’re pulling for you!

    I am too really divded on whether I would like a B-25 or B-29.
    I prefer the P-51 to the corsair becasue the  US already has a carrier plane.
    FMG has said in this set that their will be officer pieces in addition to the 2 infantry pieces
    About the artllery, the German 88mm is the only antitank gun mold made for A&A, the allied 105mm is the straightest artllery peice ever and the japanese artllery is some kind of infantry gun.

    I have only suggested the FMG make self-proppeld and rocket artillery. The only anti-tank peice suggested to represent artillery is the Jackson M36 tank destoyer, and I too question that and am in favor of the M7 Priest.


  • yea P-51. The current fighter satisfies the carrier based plane requirement


  • Not to change the subject but I was # 70 yesterday when I took FMG pole to prepay, so its still growing. I also plan on getting a set of battle dice for AA50 maybe two. So keep spreading the word.

  • '10

    @WILD:

    Not to change the subject but I was # 70 yesterday when I took FMG pole to prepay, so its still growing. I also plan on getting a set of battle dice for AA50 maybe two. So keep spreading the word.

    This is still up and running.  I am just not taking money until I have some samples to show.  Thank you for the interest!


  • IL, I was thinking maybe you could re-post this project in other parts of the forum. It would affect all the AA games & house rules etc. Not everyone that comes to this forum would come to variants. Might help get the word out just a thought.


  • Anything with “lets talk…” is basically that, so we have enough on our plate.


  • Wild Billy …

    Or were you sugesting that IL make a notice in the other fora (AAR, AA50, AAG, AAE, AAP, AABulge & AAD-Day) to make sure the whole community is aware of this project?  That is how I understood your question.  Take care.

  • '10

    i think thats a good idea.  i’ve been coming to this site for a couple years, but never went to the variants page until a couple days ago but am extemely excited for these game pieces


  • @Imperious:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Savoia-Marchetti_SM.79

    this should be Italian bomber

    If you want to set up prepay, im ready as soon as you are.

    Awwhh, that bomber is sweat as heck.  Triple engine?  Man, that’s exactly what Italy needs, a unique piece that stands out.  +1 Karma

  • Sponsor '17 TripleA '11 '10

    Hey guys! I’m excited to make this my first post ( long time lurker ). I’m in for a set of nice game pieces and probably some dice too. You guys make great stuff. You’ve got my $$$.


  • Do you guys think the Russian Bomber should be the PE-8, cause we already have that. I was thinking of a double engine like the IL-4 so that Russia would have both a heavy and medium bomber


  • It should definatly be a new type of unit, because the FMG pieces should do BOTH replace the standard set, AND use sculpts that are of a slightly different category, so many more types of units can be used for various house rules.

    This means that FMG does not make another T-34/76 Soviet tank, but makes a KV-1 or SU-122, so players can have the flexibility in either swapping out the OOB pieces for FMG pieces, or adding the FMG pieces as new types of units or units that have special roles.


  • ya, so we should want the Russian Fighter to be the IL-2 and the Russian bomber to be the IL-4, right?

    IL-2, ground attack fighter

    IL-4, Medium Bomber


  • IL-2 is great. This can be a special divebomber type. That should be the fighter

    we have a Yak from the original game and from the new AA42
    we also have the pe-8 bomber

    so for the bomber choice use the IL-4


  • Posted by: dinosaur
    Insert Quote
    Wild Billy …
    Or were you sugesting that IL make a notice in the other fora (AAR, AA50, AAG, AAE, AAP, AABulge & AAD-Day) to make sure the whole community is aware of this project?  That is how I Posted by: johnnymarr
    Insert Quote
    i think thats a good idea.  i’ve been coming to this site for a couple years, but never went to the variants page until a couple days ago but am extemely excited for these game piecesunderstood your question.  Take care.

    Yea that’s exactly what I was saying, make a post (maybe a sticky) in the other sections. I’m sure that there is a large % of gamers that don’t go to AA Variants, and have no idea about the new sculpts coming. WB

Suggested Topics

  • 1
  • 4
  • 13
  • 33
  • 2
  • 11
  • 4
  • 18
Axis & Allies Boardgaming Custom Painted Miniatures

45

Online

17.4k

Users

39.9k

Topics

1.7m

Posts