@Imperious:
The NAACP plans a four-city California tour to persuade the governor to block the execution of Stanley Tookie Williams on December 13th.
The State Supreme Court has refused to block the convicted killer’s execution. Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger will hold a private clemency hearing December 8th.
There have been lots of rallies in support of Williams, drawing big names like Jamie Foxx and Snoop Dogg.
Williams founded the Crips street gang, but became an anti-gang activist after being sent to death row in 1981. He was convicted of murdering 3 people in a very grusome manner ( i saw the pictures). And yet because he wrote some stupid childrens books, and tries to help teens stay out of games… the rationale is he has somehow paid for his crimes and deserves a lessor punishment. He even recieved a nomination for the nobel peace prize, but that was exposed as a publicity trick, because its very easy for anybody to get a nomination. The other point being that hes a black man and according to all his supporters theirs simply too many blacks in prisons ( of no fault of their own) and their is a bais against them, so goes this line of reasoning. In fact he still has stong ties to the crip gangs and as such they have mandated that they will begin shooting cops, if this man dies on the 13th. Why does the black community always back a loser? And those anti- death crowds put out all these facts that focus on the same tactic, while their real intentions are only that nobody should die under the law, as their is no event that could warrant this punishment.
Its real sad that our poor white boy jeffrey Dalmer didnt get such a turning out of all the actors and chefs in the comminity, after all they could had emeril lagasse prepare Jeff’s herb crusted leg of sam recipe on that food network, or passed out brocures on the nutritional merits of eating Human meat or say their too many canabilists that have been convicted awaiting death.
Now for my serious post.
I am against the death penalty, not for “humane” reasons that you claim most people who are against it are.
I am cheap, it costs too much. This case is the best example, 24 years of this crap going on? All that money on appeals just blown to kill this guy? Life w/o parole, this would have been settled at least a decade ago (unless new evidence came to light). All this money being spent just to kill him? Like life in prison is oh so great. Hell, I would rather be put to death than suffer a daily bathroom rape.
Now from the other side, “well, we just need to cut past all the appeals”. That is BS. The system is there to protect the innocent, not the guilty. If I were falsely accused of something I would want every protection available to me. Ya, this guy is probably as guilty as Dalmer was. Clear cut case as far as it goes. But where do you draw the line on a crime saying that the evidence is enough to supercede (sp) their rights? That line can, and would get very blury if you cut out all the safe guards.
So I think the safe guards are a MUST. If the death penalty was a deterant than I could see a reason for it, but I have never heard any stats that says that it is.
My father was an abusive drunk. When I was a teen I told my friends that “if i could get away with it” I would off the guy (yes it was stupid, but I was a teenager). Now lets say some crazy asshole went into my parent’s house and killed him. If my friends did not want to lie, they would have to tell the court that I had said those things. Now I am on death row for a crime that I did not commit.
Sorry, I am not going to give up my rights so that a few people can satisfy their bloodlust. I call it bloodlust because their is no rational reason for killing the guy.
I feel no compassion for killers, I just don’t see the good in killing them. It won’t bring back the victems. Now torturing terrorist makes sense to me because it can prevent deaths. That is a BIG difference.