Mal, You are only saying that because you are “White” :)
Canada has a LONG tradition of race based legislation and policies. It’s just a fact. From the treaties, to today’s Indian act, it is what we do, and have always done. The fact is and remains that we govern people by their ethnicity in this country, despite my VEHEMENT disagreement with this policy, as you have seen in the local news, a certain amount of pandering to these hold-outs gets done.
Specifically in regards to my support for the interment at the time of the Japanese… I think I should motivate.
I live on the west coast, and people on the west coast were FIRE BOMBED by the japanese, and shelled. Unpopular occurences, allied soldiers were treated abominably, and so were those living under japanese occupation.
In speaking with SURVIVORS, who remember the Japanese interment in living memory, the interment was as much for the protection of Canadian people, as it was for the PROTECTION of the Japanese aswell, who were constant targets of malicious citizens hell bent on dealing one to the “enemy”.
It is also well documented here in Victoria, that many Japanese were caught storing arms and ammuntion in the walls of their homes in preparation for a “hopeful” victory.
All in all, as uncomfortable as cruel as interment is considered - surely as a means to protect portions of the public from other portions of the public (A two way street), it was an appropriate means to do so.
Again, the only criminal portion was the issue of property NOT being returned to the Japanese. That was criminal.
But I suppose, many Canadians weren’t returned to their homes either were they? And some portion of the public surely felt as you do MrMalachi, that Japanese, comes firt is Japanese-Canadian, :P