Let me know how it goes (I never tried this before, I’ve been a bit busy)!
Face-to-Face Tournament Rules
-
2. Prizes- I know you have a nice prize stash for the winners at Gencon and Origins. Â However, having a prize for everyone there is huge. Â For example at the Dominion qualifier, we charged $5 for the tourny. Â With that cash I was able to buy prizes for everyone. Â RioGrandeGames gave me free promos for everyone+ we had free raffles for the new Base Cards -$11 a piece- we got 8 of them. Â Plenty of prizes went out and people left the tournament at least getting something and several others much more. Â This made people very happy and I got rave reviews about the tourny online and in-person.
For AA, I would ask WOTC if they have any cheap giveaways and for all the players that come- free raffle them off. Â For example I would ask them for things like the old IC pieces or IPC money maybe. Â For an event like yours they should be putting out some things for everyone coming. Â Personally if it was me I would get the cheap extra AA pieces and money at HistoricalBoardGaming.com. Â It pays to have a lot of cheap, mass quantity items to give away by the dozens. Â Its nice to have the big prizes (trophies, games) for the winners but that can get expensive I’m sure unless WOTC is putting out the $$$$ for that. Â Maybe you already do this- just wanted to share some thoughts on what worked with us on the Dominion side of things.
Q, I know you have not been to GEN CON in awhile, but basically, we do this now. Â We have a prize give away on Sunday around noon-1pm for all those that participated in any 1 AA event. Â I give out door prize tickets and give away tons of stuff for everyone. Â
And with that being said, I always trying and have enough for most if not all that come and play. Â Like a pen or something…and a lot of stuff does already come from vendors like HBG (thanks Doug!)…
I guess this brings up a point that must be brought to light regarding anyone that questions what we do and why we do what we do at the CON’s. Â If someone hasn’t been there, and hasn’t been there more recently, how can anyone say anything negative about players, the rules systems, prizes etc. for anything we do for FTF play without knowing all the facts? Â And then proceed in making comments on threads and eventually causing a big stir…?
Hey, we will be the first ones to say we don’t know everything about FTF play and AA in general and are ALWAYS OPEN to new ideas, suggestions and the like. Â It is just when onlinerss (and that includes those that play FTF online, I guess if that is possible, but then that is where my lack of knowledge about playing online starts and stops and I won’t make comments on how that version of AA is played or what works better for that crowd) start jumping the gun before they really know and can comment on the experience first hand.
This is good to hear, my apologies- it has been a few years since I came.
-
The point I am trying to make is the use of AI in a FTF event. � I would like that a professor of your stature would understand the simplicity of why I typically don’t permit electronic devices in tournment games at the CON’s. � If one wants to do the math in their head and right it down, AND IT DOES NOT TAKE AWAY FROM THE GAME AT HAND, then have at it. � **And as long as your opponent can do the same thing without taking away from the game at hand, have at it. **
But I don’t care if an app on ones phone is free, or easily accessable to you and the other 5% that might be intersted in that, if your opponent sits down and doesn’t have their phone with them, and doesn’t have the app you have, then I am not going to permit it. �Â
Ok, long overlydrawn Batman analogy aside, your saying here that if I play in your tournament and I also allow my opponent to use my phone also with the AACalc, giving him “equal access to the tool” (heck I’ll even show him how to use it) then all is fair and I can use it right??? That’s what it sounds like to me.
You cannot use electronic calculators. Period.
-
The point I am trying to make is the use of AI in a FTF event. �� I would like that a professor of your stature would understand the simplicity of why I typically don’t permit electronic devices in tournment games at the CON’s. �� If one wants to do the math in their head and right it down, AND IT DOES NOT TAKE AWAY FROM THE GAME AT HAND, then have at it. �� **And as long as your opponent can do the same thing without taking away from the game at hand, have at it.� **
But I don’t care if an app on ones phone is free, or easily accessable to you and the other 5% that might be intersted in that, if your opponent sits down and doesn’t have their phone with them, and doesn’t have the app you have, then I am not going to permit it. ��
Ok, long overlydrawn Batman analogy aside, your saying here that if I play in your tournament and I also allow my opponent to use my phone also with the AACalc, giving him “equal access to the tool” (heck I’ll even show him how to use it) then all is fair and I can use it right???� That’s what it sounds like to me.
You cannot use electronic calculators. Period.
Yeap…it is now in the rules as well. Thanks Q…
http://smo63.fatcow.com/pdf/G40rules81.pdf
and
http://smo63.fatcow.com/pdf/2012EndTimeRules730.pdf
Dave, Also above is the stalling rules that you asked about…
Greg
-
The point I am trying to make is the use of AI in a FTF event. � I would like that a professor of your stature would understand the simplicity of why I typically don’t permit electronic devices in tournment games at the CON’s. � If one wants to do the math in their head and right it down, AND IT DOES NOT TAKE AWAY FROM THE GAME AT HAND, then have at it. � **And as long as your opponent can do the same thing without taking away from the game at hand, have at it. **
But I don’t care if an app on ones phone is free, or easily accessable to you and the other 5% that might be intersted in that, if your opponent sits down and doesn’t have their phone with them, and doesn’t have the app you have, then I am not going to permit it. �Â
Ok, long overlydrawn Batman analogy aside, your saying here that if I play in your tournament and I also allow my opponent to use my phone also with the AACalc, giving him “equal access to the tool” (heck I’ll even show him how to use it) then all is fair and I can use it right??? That’s what it sounds like to me.
Greg,
Looks like you tried to answer but the forum didn’t pick it up for some reason…answer to this???
-
The point I am trying to make is the use of AI in a FTF event. �� I would like that a professor of your stature would understand the simplicity of why I typically don’t permit electronic devices in tournment games at the CON’s. �� If one wants to do the math in their head and right it down, AND IT DOES NOT TAKE AWAY FROM THE GAME AT HAND, then have at it. �� **And as long as your opponent can do the same thing without taking away from the game at hand, have at it.� **
But I don’t care if an app on ones phone is free, or easily accessable to you and the other 5% that might be intersted in that, if your opponent sits down and doesn’t have their phone with them, and doesn’t have the app you have, then I am not going to permit it. ��
Ok, long overlydrawn Batman analogy aside, your saying here that if I play in your tournament and I also allow my opponent to use my phone also with the AACalc, giving him “equal access to the tool” (heck I’ll even show him how to use it) then all is fair and I can use it right???� That’s what it sounds like to me.
Greg,
Looks like you tried to answer but the forum didn’t pick it up for some reason…answer to this???
Yeah, can’t find what I wrote now? Oh, well…
-
I think he agreed with something you said…and the server blew up. :evil:
-
You might be right…all I know is that I can’t find it. Regardless, that is my story and I am sticky to it…
-
You might be right…all I know is that I can’t find it. Regardless, that is my story and I am sticky to it…
So…what did you say about my question above???
-
Not sure, what were we talking about? FTF tournaments?
-
-
Just looked at your new “end time rules”. A little more refined and detailed which is nice. No phones/electronic devices rule- fair enough. Don’t really see how this “cheats” the game or how its “not fair” even if I let my opponent use it but whatever, its your tourny, your call. I could play with or without it. Having these available would speed up the game and end time rules wouldn’t be such an issue.
Speaking of which I would have to practice using these end time rules a couple of times. Someone could cry wolf as Allies to speed the game up. If I were Allies I would cry wolf in the early rounds, as I can play the first few rounds of any of these games fairly fast. As Axis one would want to slow the game down. The GM would be the one to determine what defines “stalling”. This is why I like chess clocks because then that is out of the GMs hands. One can’t argue with the clock. However the financial side of chess clocks makes it tough on everyone which I understand. With these end time rules one could, work the system, to tailor it to their opening(s).
Also, I do like the minimum round column, however, if both are playing slow and they don’t get to 6 six rounds by the end of the stoppage time, are they both disqualified??? I could see both pointing the finger at each other blaming the other team for “stalling”. Don’t get me wrong its a much better system than before but not foolproof. I’ll have to try the end time system at home along with the chess clock for a couple of games.
For minimum round column- G40 should be 11-12 not 8-10. All the other games go a round past the hours given and even though G40 has more countries to take a turn most of those countries are played very quickly. France and China are nil. ANZAC and Italy are fairly quick also. The rest of the countries take no more time than the 42 game.
I’m not ripping your system Greg, I’m just interested how they playout vs. using a chess clock. I’m sure for most of the players there it works. For the more competitive AA players like the ones I know here on this site, they would work the system and exploit the loopholes. I post results from these test games in the next month or two. Should be interesting. Have fun at GenCon!
-
Chess clocks are easily manipulated. It’s my turn, I make attacks, you need to chose casualties, and instead you can sit there and debate about it for minutes eating away at my time.
In chess, a player never has to wait during their own time for their opponent to do something.
I don’t think chess clocks are the answer.
-
I had an idea that I briefly chatted with Greg and, I think, Mike over the weekend.
The biggest trouble in a tournament is time. First, you have to limit the time on games in order to even hold such an event in a short period of time (yes 1 to 3.5 days is short). The next trouble about time is not knowing how many turns you will complete in 4.75 hours. For 42SE, in very bad cases, 4 rounds, and in very good cases 7 rounds.
What if you make a bid for both IPCs and number of rounds?
I can win with the Allies with 12 IPCs in 6 rounds. I don’t know how bidding works from there but that’s how it starts.
As for penalties for not finishing your bid rounds in the allotted time, I’m not sure about that either.
-
You cannot use electronic calculators. Period.
This was painful after nights of very few hours of sleep and your opponent hits you with a strategic bombing. A calculator would’ve speed up some of my purchase optimizations. Beyond that, I didn’t see much need for it.
With a calculator, the rule should be like the dice. Feel free to bring one but if you opponent requests to use it, you can’t say no. If both players don’t have one, no problem.
-
Dave,
Interesting thought - to be honest, I am not sure I looked at using a calculator for purchasing purposes - but with SBR and such, I could see where that might come in handy.
We always looked at it through the lens of using something like that to help people determine how much attack or defense they needed for a particular battle. That, I believe, is still something that will probably never be allowed.
MM
-
Chess clocks are easily manipulated. It’s my turn, I make attacks, you need to chose casualties, and instead you can sit there and debate about it for minutes eating away at my time.
In chess, a player never has to wait during their own time for their opponent to do something.
I don’t think chess clocks are the answer.
Wrong, you don’t know how to apply them like I’m talking about. That being said, chess clocks aren’t the answer ONLY for financial difficulties- $50 a clock for a good one.
-
You cannot use electronic calculators. Period.
This was painful after nights of very few hours of sleep and your opponent hits you with a strategic bombing. A calculator would’ve speed up some of my purchase optimizations. Beyond that, I didn’t see much need for it.
With a calculator, the rule should be like the dice. Feel free to bring one but if you opponent requests to use it, you can’t say no. If both players don’t have one, no problem.
Point being it would speed up the game to some extent- not a lot- but some. There’s really NO valid reason why these can’t be used. Haven’t heard one yet. Foolish but hey, not my tournament.
Bidding on rounds and IPCs is interesting but if you bid 6 rounds and don’t get that far- what happens.
4-7 rounds for a 42 game DOES NOT determine a true winner- that’s ridiculous. I’m so glad I did waste my money to go down there. That makes AA.org tournaments so much better IMHO
-
Players should be planning their purchases, whilst their opponent is doing THIER turn.
A PEN and PAPER is all that is required, if it’s becoming too much of a headache.
-
You cannot use electronic calculators. Period.
This was painful after nights of very few hours of sleep and your opponent hits you with a strategic bombing. A calculator would’ve speed up some of my purchase optimizations. Beyond that, I didn’t see much need for it.
With a calculator, the rule should be like the dice. Feel free to bring one but if you opponent requests to use it, you can’t say no. If both players don’t have one, no problem.
Point being it would speed up the game to some extent- not a lot- but some. There’s really NO valid reason why these can’t be used. Haven’t heard one yet. Foolish but hey, not my tournament.
Bidding on rounds and IPCs is interesting but if you bid 6 rounds and don’t get that far- what happens.
4-7 rounds for a 42 game DOES NOT determine a true winner- that’s ridiculous. I’m so glad I did waste my money to go down there. That makes AA.org tournaments so much better IMHO
Q, a calculator is fine. All one does with that is make sure their math is correct. It is NOT a dice roller or odds calculator. There is a big difference. If you feel that it is needed to speed things up, have at it…But the math in most cases should be simple enough…the point is, and Dave hits it on the head, when you are in a situation as one is in one of the tournaments, knowing what to buy, how much, and when is part of the strategy. Having to go to a calculator to see if one should attack a certain area on the board based on an odds calculator is a whole different story.
And what do you mean you haven’t heard a valid reason yet? You just aren’t listening. And no, it is not foolish, the only thing that is, are statements like that.
-
You know, if is funny, we get back from a fantastic CON. Things went almost flawless. Had great discussions about how to possibly make things better for the future, etc. Chess clocks, time, rounds etc. In every single case where we discussed the events in length, we had civil discussions because those talking about whatever the topic was, understood first hand what we being discussed.
And I know that some of you have been to GEN CON and have experienced events first hand. But I am not sure why there is so much negativety when it comes to the discussion on the boards vs. when one talks about it FTF. Again, I believe MM might have said it somewhere bad in a thread long ago, it sure is nice to hide behind the screen of your computer when one really doesn’t know understand the concept of what is being discussed? :mrgreen:
Suggested Topics
