A couple hours ago, I saw an Ash for President poster as http://www.somethingawful.com/articles.php?a=2079&p=3.
Disclaimer: somethingawful has a lot of things that will likely offend somebody, and this is my warning. If you find something you don’t like, I told you so.
Either one works for me, but I tend to actually be able to win at turn-based games.
It still amazes me how a Italian force of over 500,000 men could not manage to capture the British held Africa against a force a fraction of their own.
The Italian army was not as highly mechanized as the British, probably also not as well trained.
I’m italian! I find that comment very insulting! Mussolini didn’t mess hitler up that much!!! Hitler was the one that initiated the treaty with him! Also, he wasn’t really “bloated” He wore a form of suit that made him appear bigger! :x
Well let’s see…we already know that two of the things on your list were caused by Italy, so if Hitler hadn’t made the treaty, then that would have been a plus for Hitler, wouldn’t it? He would then not have had to commit necessary divisions to Africa and the Balkans-well he probably would have attacked the Balkans anyway, as they were there, but Germany would have been able to choose their battles instead of bailing out their Italian “allies.”
Oh, and what did Italy ever do for Germany? It isn’t a very good alliance when you have to do all the work now, is it?
Surely one could move German trains into Poland until you got to the Bug River where they met trains of the USSR, which were a different gauge so, you must transfer from one train to the next.
Yes, except that would only get you so far until you ran into the scorched earth.
All right, time for a little logic:
Battle of El Alamein, Balkans: Due to alliance with Italy.
Krisstalnacht, Barbarossa: Due to Hitler.
Battle of Britain: Failed due to Goring.
Warsaw Ghetto: Can’t recall exact details.
So we can logically conclude from the list given that most devastating to Germany in WWII were either Hitler or the Rome-Berlin Axis, which of course was encouraged by Hitler, so therefore the true worst thing to happen to Germany was Hitler.
I know it’s not very good logic. :wink:
People. I will repeat again. QUOTE EXACTLY OR DONT QUOTE AT ALL! I will NOT have this blasphemy against the movie.
Yes, unfortunately you can’t do anything about it. Now, how to respond in quote form:
Let’s just go with: “GET ON WITH IT!”
Just ignore him!
Warning: Do not ignore the mods, they’ll edit you into next week, and then you’ll have a temporal anomaly on your hands.
Seriously, though, it’s widely known that the Holy Grail is beloved by all, and those who don’t like it aren’t worth wasting time on. :roll: So this is more or less a pointless forum. Probably not the dumbest ever, but I’m not going to bother arguing that point.
Very true F_alk! I’m glad someone revived this post, cause i love talking about it!
Patriotism is something the Russians had in the ton Stalins country was just so willing to die for the motherland cough cough :lol:
I also think Germany would have had trouble waging blitzkrieg in the siberian region! :-?
I don’t know, once you get the tanks outfitted for cold, it wouldn’t be too hard, of course I’m going without maps here, but IIRC Siberia is pretty flat, and good for blitzkriegs.
When i agree with what someones saying am i supposed to say a paragraph on how i agree with them, or should i say just “i agree”, The answer is easy, I agree is much easier to say!!!
Or, you could just not respond at all, it’s not always necessary to say that you agree, unless you have points to add to their argument. (unless you’re blatantly trying to add to your post count)