hey, is there a mapview modual for lotr risk?
Latest posts made by dropkickjake
-
RE: Is the new "Lord of the Rings" RISK any good???
-
RE: GERMANY: THE DO'S AND DON'TS
is that in 2nd or third edition rules, or a house rule?
if i have overlooked this ruke, then a persia ic is worthless
-
RE: Bush
the issue u havent addressed is innocense. abortion is the murder of an innocent child. dp is puttingf someone to death because of a crime(s) that they commited
that being said i am both pro life and anti-dp. u think the only way someone should be put to death is if they pose a threat to society wile behind bars
-
RE: GERMANY: THE DO'S AND DON'TS
is that a house rule u play with?
i didnt think there was a linit to the output of ic’s,
if u use this house rule, how does karelia stand up against the germans?
-
RE: GERMANY: THE DO'S AND DON'TS
i see no problem with a pesia ic, in fact, i am quite fond of the idea.
with this, u dont need to worry about building transports only to have germany take them out before you can use them. persia is very centeral on the board and can feed manny different fronts. it can easily help russia by sending troops into caucasus, it can attack japans land holdings in a few turns, and it can send troops in to retake africa
-
RE: Education in th USA
@Grigoriy:
louisiana purchass. it was sold for less than 1 cent an acre i beleive, while alaska was sold for 2
Actually, the Louisiana Purchase was 3 cents an acre.* Where I live now, land goes for 1000 an acre. Talk about inflation!
*And this is why France hates us today.
thats odd, where i live (louisiana) we have been taught it was less than 1. also, it the la territory had no deffinate western boundry
-
RE: Education in th USA
louisiana purchass. it was sold for less than 1 cent an acre i beleive, while alaska was sold for 2
-
RE: Free for all rules
i highly recomend it
i’ll never forget my friends faces when i landed in there capitols
-
RE: Does this worry anyone else?
i beleive that he meant that they have little or no military experience.
i dont beleive that the prez should be a military position at all, but i do beleive that the prez should have served in the armed forces for a time. and come war time i think that the military should be directed by the military, and not a civilian prez.
-
RE: Yet another reason . . .
u say that we owe iraq a lot, and yet that we shouldnt be there….
u seem to be contradicting yourself here…