• 3 sets for me at least, dont really care about the price. Cant wait to start painting them


  • for god’s sake. please put a pre order option on ur website. then we can help out with ur financing of this great product. and for all those ppl who are complaining about the price. wait until you see te final price. stop nagging. a deluxe version always costs more. thats how everything works. and no, im no millionaire. im just a poor student.


  • Probably not cost effective for FMG to sell striped down basic sets becouse their main cost is for producing and designing the molds. if you have been playing this game long enough you know the value of having 2 types of tanks and bombers etc. for alot of people, 2 or 3 full sets of 42 or revised will work just fine. my board is like 4ft.x 8ft.( about as big as a ping pong table)and cost about $200.00. So  for insane people like me and the other loonies on this forum GO FMG!!! I will buy these sets 1 at a time when i have alittle extra money here and there. till then ill have to get by with the pieces i have accumulated over the past 25 years.
    its always about takin it to the next level.


  • I’d love to purchase all the nations, but I couldn’t justify paying more for pieces then I did for the game.  To those who will, consider yourself lucky to be able to afford it.


  • @Dr:

    I’d love to purchase all the nations, but I couldn’t justify paying more for pieces then I did for the game.  To those who will, consider yourself lucky to be able to afford it.

    If you buy an AA50 right now, then you could justify buying the pieces because they would be a little less in price than that game. :-D


  • dont you need the rulebook for AA50 thou?


  • @lnmajor:

    dont you need the rulebook for AA50 thou?

    It usually comes with the game.


  • @Dr:

    I’d love to purchase all the nations, but I couldn’t justify paying more for pieces then I did for the game.  To those who will, consider yourself lucky to be able to afford it.

    FMG, there are probably a whole lot of people such as this that you are going to miss out on. My guess is that the higher your price, the more customers you will lose on a geometric proportion. I will still buy your pieces, but I am afraid people like me are far and few between.


  • FMG for clarity and the avoidance of doubt, I wish you every success and I’m 100% confident that your products will be awesome!

    I really appreciate what you’re bringing to the community.
    BZ

    #534-531


  • @allboxcars:

    FMG for clarity and the avoidance of doubt, I wish you every success and I’m 100% confident that your products will be awesome!

    I really appreciate what you’re bringing to the community.
    BZ

    #534-531

    @cminke:

    amen

    I cannot wait to pre-order these pieces after years of disapointment over piece quality/quantity by WOTC this is a golden opportunity to right all those wrongs.

    Thank you FMG


  • Oh yeah, and as far as the price goes I think 40-50 bucks is more than fair for an initial run.  FMG has put all their money into this project not just to make them more money but to provide us with something we have all wanted for a long long time.  Hopefully we will back them up and make this worth their time and effort, and if they are smart they can take future lines down a bit on price after their R&D is paid for to back up a loyal customer/community base.

    Honestly how long do you need to save up for at least one set of pieces?  Its not like each nation will come out one week after the other it will take a long time to get all the nations completed, and without our support along the way they never will be completed.


  • @Yoper:

    And my point is that no matter how much I would like them to sell it at a low price, especially since I know that will dramatically increase the number of sales, they have to operate about what it costs them to produce it.

    I was originally talking about how I can’t see them being able to produce it under a certain cost which is where my opinion then was as to how much they will have to charge for the product.

    Once the mold cost is recovered, the production costs will be very low. How do you think that you can buy a big bag of plastic soldiers for $1 at any toy store.


  • How I see it is a $5 profit on (1) item is the same as a $1 profit on (5) items.

    And that is how they should look at it.  You can’t increase sales by increasing prices.


  • @Johnson73:

    How I see it is a $5 profit on (1) item is the same as a $1 profit on (5) items.

    And that is how they should look at it.  You can’t increase sales by increasing prices.

    The only fault in that logic is that the community is not actually overly huge and in general is willing to spend a fair bit on a board game.  So as your demand is high and your supply is low, they will charge a bit of a premium for their product.  It will be as reasonable as possible, I’m sure.


  • @Johnson73:

    How I see it is a $5 profit on (1) item is the same as a $1 profit on (5) items.

    And that is how they should look at it.  You can’t increase sales by increasing prices.

    Besides the issue stated above (gamer population) … FMG is not looking to make major (or even minor) profits.  All they want is cool stuff and to have that cool stuff fund the next set of cool stuff!

    Profit is not part of their business plan.  Breaking even and having a ton of cool game stuff is.


  • does anyone else wonder how big the “gamer population” is for A+A?


  • @lnmajor:

    does anyone else wonder how big the “gamer population” is for A+A?

    I would love to know that also.

    As for the issue of FMG duplicating existing WOTC sculpts (say for example creating another ME 109 fighter), I think that they should avoid duplication where possible. This gives their product line the most flexibility. If a person wants to completely replace their existing WOTC pieces good. If a person  wants to Supplement their WOTC pieces with additional pieces from FMG to effectively double the number of unit types in there game even better.

    Bottom line the general rule should be to create new sculpts after different models than WOTC where feasible. In cases where a nation really only had one practical choice of a unit (aka Bismark Class Battleship) then that class should be used. This is of course only my opinion. Feel free to agree or disagree.

    I for one hope that FMG makes a healthy profit on this project which enables them to “Fast Track” the rest of the Combat Units set. I hope that they will eventually get around to creating a TECHNOLOGY/WEAPON’S DEVELOPMENT SET complete with V2 Rockets, ME 262s, Long range Aircraft ect.


  • I have like 6 or 7 sets of WOTC pieces. hope FMG does new sculpts or i probably wont be as interested. i dont think that will be the case thou.


  • Definetly want TECHNOLOGY/WEAPONS DEVELOPMENT SET!!!
    Great idea


  • @Rorschach:

    Profit is not part of their business plan.  Breaking even and having a ton of cool game stuff is.

    OK yeah. Sure.
    I think…heck, I HOPE the plan’s not quite that “innocent” otherwise we’ll never see that cool game stuff.

    Last I checked nobody owning a business was being consigned to hell for wanting to make a profit.
    In fact I’m quite sure FMG’s kids want to college or even eat every once in awhile, have a roof over their heads etc.

    #541

3 / 5

Suggested Topics

Axis & Allies Boardgaming Custom Painted Miniatures

44

Online

17.6k

Users

40.2k

Topics

1.7m

Posts