L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3

[Amon-Sul]

@trulpen

It will be tomorrow morning. Before noon definitely.

[trulpen]

Yes, I’ll try and be patient. You sleep well now.

[Amon-Sul]

@trulpen said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:

@Amon-Sul said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:

Well I need to watch my every move very closely. I feel like I am playing against chess computer which does not make mistakes.

Haha, like changing the purchase into a completely wasted ab and losing a tr, ac and cr?

Well I had courage there.
I had luck there.

and U did not expect that Ur sub could not fight there.

So I had 3/3 , all things fell the right way.

[Amon-Sul]

and the airbase is not waisted. U are using it (well) since then , and probably will do in the future.

ok, i ll go look germany.

cheers

[Amon-Sul]

Germany is the most complex Axis power for me to play with. Do not know how it is for U, is it maybe Japan?

[trulpen]

Yes, I think Japan is the most complex in the beginning atleast, with all that air. But it evens out. Both are challenging.

[Amon-Sul]

And what do U say about Italy?

[trulpen]

Very fun when they thrive, but is usually tightly kept. Not in this game though. You’ve played them aggressive and well.

[Amon-Sul]

That ankward start of German turn when U have 4 ICs to repair xd

[trulpen]

The only two shadows in your setups is holding out on the Russians and lack of land in Asia.

[trulpen]

Yes, and not so high income as well. That hurts. Which was the point of all that SBR.

[trulpen]

Don’t think you’ll repair it all, but that’s 21 IPC of damage. A bit on the low side. With mean dice it would’ve been 27-28.

[trulpen]

I took quite a high risk there when blocking with 2 des. If Italy had succeded breaking the block that whole fleet would now be ocean filling.

[Amon-Sul]

@trulpen said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:

The only two shadows in your setups is holding out on the Russians and lack of land in Asia.

Yeah, well, I am a solid, not a perfect player.

And some sacrificies had to be made for greater good.

[Amon-Sul]

@trulpen said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:

Yes, and not so high income as well. That hurts. Which was the point of all that SBR.

I miss Novgorod, that is +7 ;)

[trulpen]

@Amon-Sul said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:

And some sacrificies had to be made for greater good.

Said the Nazi! :laughing:

[Amon-Sul]

@trulpen said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:

I took quite a high risk there when blocking with 2 des. If Italy had succeded breaking the block that whole fleet would now be ocean filling.

I had 30 % I think, I simply had to try.

[trulpen]

Yes, that was the main point of stacking there. Not so much to put pressure on Finland and Norway. On short sight that’s rather pointless for dear Russia.

[Amon-Sul]

@trulpen said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:

The only two shadows in your setups is holding out on the Russians and lack of land in Asia.

What do U mean by holding out on the Russians, U mean playing too defensively against Russia?

[Amon-Sul]

@trulpen said in L20 #2 Amon-Sul (X) vs trulpen (A+7) BM3:

Yes, that was the main point of stacking there. Not so much to put pressure on Finland and Norway. On short sight that’s rather pointless for dear Russia.

Allied cooperation. nice.