Where would you like your bid to be placed?
L20 #1 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+7) BM3
-
@trulpen said in L20 #1 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+7) BM3:
There were two or three big sea battles that went Germany’s way. Most of the small ones went the Allied way.
Yeah but in big ones tuv difference can be 100. In small one its 4 or 5. But yes 20 x 5 = 100.
-
Like when I failed to take control of sz112 the first time with more than 80 % odds or you massacred me in sz6 with less than 20 % odds.
-
@trulpen said in L20 #1 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+7) BM3:
Like when I failed to take control of sz112 the first time with more than 80 % odds or you massacred me in sz6 with less than 20 % odds.
I had a bunch of subs in sz 6 and a strategic/tactical advance.
But in was late in the game wouldnt change much.
As for sz 112 I forgot to place AC there.
And i had bad rolls there before, its nice i got it back (not the entire tuv minus but still much).And i ve rolled 5/5 there remember so u passed even ‘well’ as u could P
-
My sub in sz25 had an amazing moment once. That’s it. 😉
Actually, I think the small ones are more sure. Atleast when you have +90 %. And I lost plenty of those.
With lots of dice almost anything can happen. Something which saved Germany’s ass atleast twice.
-
@trulpen said in L20 #1 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+7) BM3:
My sub in sz25 had an amazing moment once. That’s it. 😉
Actually, I think the small ones are more sure. Atleast when you have +90 %. And I lost plenty of those.
With lots of dice almost anything can happen. Something which saved Germany’s ass atleast twice.
U can point that way, but its not the same to have 90% battle when u have units attackin on 4, and when u have those attacking at 2.
But nominally its 90%, but its unpredictable. -
@trulpen said in L20 #1 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+7) BM3:
My sub in sz25 had an amazing moment once. That’s it. 😉
Actually, I think the small ones are more sure. Atleast when you have +90 %. And I lost plenty of those.
With lots of dice almost anything can happen. Something which saved Germany’s ass atleast twice.
But maybe i also lost some small battles. Not as, u but did. I didnt look and count
-
Don’t remember any ac. And the mistaken roll was a sorry situation.
Well, all in all a very well played game on your part. Would love to try it again. I’m not so sure of the validity of the all-out Chinese support, but perhaps I just lack rational insight.
-
I think U played pretty well but that I played better enough to win the game. The dice overall helped, or not distrupt my effort i can say, but i think that my win is deserved, and if U pulled 8 vc in europe or 6 in the pacific it would be deserved too, since thats the catch in this game, the axis can win even if they are weaker, or almost down at one side of the board
-
@Amon-Sul said in L20 #1 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+7) BM3:
But maybe i also lost some small battles. Not as, u but did. I didnt look and count
You definitely lost some small battles. Especially with Russia. It happened with the Chinese. Stilm the ratio was about 9:1.
-
@trulpen said in L20 #1 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+7) BM3:
Don’t remember any ac. And the mistaken roll was a sorry situation.
Well, all in all a very well played game on your part. Would love to try it again. I’m not so sure of the validity of the all-out Chinese support, but perhaps I just lack rational insight.
I wrote to u that i wanted to buy it and then redo the buy and forgot it
-
Oh, I didn’t see that. Sorry. Would’ve contemplated it atleast.
-
When was it? Before I hit sz112 the forst time and failed?
-
@trulpen said in L20 #1 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+7) BM3:
Don’t remember any ac. And the mistaken roll was a sorry situation.
Well, all in all a very well played game on your part. Would love to try it again. I’m not so sure of the validity of the all-out Chinese support, but perhaps I just lack rational insight.
Well, i do not know too, but it worked in this game and i did not know U are an Elite player, with 5-1 win loss rating, so it was tested on a very strong opponent. But the thing is there was an element of surprise on my part which i would not have on any future battle with me as the allies against u
-
@trulpen said in L20 #1 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+7) BM3:
When was it? Before I hit sz112 the forst time and failed?
Just before that battle where i scored 5/5 and we nullified it.
-
@trulpen said in L20 #1 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+7) BM3:
Oh, I didn’t see that. Sorry. Would’ve contemplated it atleast.
I said i wont changes so dont worry. My bad. I have to play more patiently.
-
Me too.
It definitely worked! I underestimated the power of that opening and didn’t respond accordingly. Played in a standard way, trying to control all of China, which dispersed power too much.
-
Think I’m tier 1 now and with a 5/5 win ratio.
-
@trulpen said in L20 #1 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+7) BM3:
Me too.
It definitely worked! I underestimated the power of that opening and didn’t respond accordingly. Played in a standard way, trying to control all of China, which dispersed power too much.
And the Korea move confused U.
I personally think I am not a bad player, but that U are better, but in this game I think the element of surprise whas much more on my part.
In some parts of the game i felt like chess player playing against a powerful PC. Xd
-
@trulpen said in L20 #1 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+7) BM3:
Think I’m tier 1 now and with a 5/5 win ratio.
U play so many games at the same time so maybe that affects the results. I am, sure U ll be a, high 1, or come back to E again
-
And I think that my constant attacks against U when i had 30, 40 or 50 % odds confused U too. I ve combined attacks with allies, made some sacrificies, but disrupted Ur plans.
And economy was working for me so I could afford it
Suggested Topics
