@toblerone77 A bit late to the party here but anyway…!
The sculpts are made in a lighter plastic than later versions and the Japanese infantry sculpts, for example, really show this. Lots of them have half their helmets missing and their rifle stocks are too thin and are thus often bowed or malformed. Another example is Italian tanks which have smaller and far inferior sculpts to the europe 1940 version.
This is my favourite Axis and Allies version regardless and I have swapped out all the pieces with better sculpts from other version. Its probably cost me a fortune in potential re sales but I don’t care.
News flash: AXIS & ALLIES ANNIVERSARY EDITION due out oct 23 08
-
may i ask a question IL?Why 4 copies?gifts,or just a big fan 8-)
i ordered 2 for the extra pieces,and heck,having 2 is just better imo. :wink:
-
Imperious Leader '17 '16 '15 Organizer '14 Customizer '13 '12 '11 '10last edited by Aug 1, 2008, 12:23 AM
I will buy a 5th copy the day it comes out.
This game will be used to replace my other piece sets as a full upgrade for all my global variants sake the metal and painted metal piece sets. I am the type of person who has to have the best equipment to do the job because aesthetics is very important to my gaming experience.
This game will be sold out and will go on ebay for big bucks eventually. I will only open 3 out of my 5 copies and keep 2 sealed forever.
-
@Imperious:
I will buy a 5th copy the day it comes out.
This game will be used to replace my other piece sets as a full upgrade for all my global variants sake the metal and painted metal piece sets. I am the type of person who has to have the best equipment to do the job because aesthetics is very important to my gaming experience.
This game will be sold out and will go on ebay for big bucks eventually. I will only open 3 out of my 5 copies and keep 2 sealed forever.
very interesting thanks.Is there only a limited number being sold?For a limited amount of time?And will the pieces be more personalized?Will we seedifferent tank,infantry,air and naval units,has there been any news of this?
-
Imperious Leader '17 '16 '15 Organizer '14 Customizer '13 '12 '11 '10last edited by Aug 1, 2008, 2:28 AM
well each nation had its own cruiser piece
Chinese units are now different sculpts
German fighter, and USA fighter new
UK, American and Soviet artillery unique
UK tank new
German tank now is replaced by the Bulge tank
All new set of Italian pieces ( in every aspect they are different from anybody else)
I think the AA guns and factories are gonna be different too.
-
german tank replaced by the bulge tank,what does it look like,do you have a picture of this,would be most grateful :lol:
-
Imperious Leader '17 '16 '15 Organizer '14 Customizer '13 '12 '11 '10last edited by Aug 1, 2008, 3:36 AM
goto Boardgame geek.com and look for axis and allies bulge.
-
if my eyes do not decieve me,it looks like a panther for their tank,and an 88 for their artillery correct?
Would be nice to also see 105’s for their arty,as well as King Tigers for their tank pieces imo,or stug’s.
-
@Imperious:
goto Boardgame geek.com and look for axis and allies bulge.
Wonderful! I like very much the BotB panzers!
-
@LT04:
:-D I just ordered my copy. :-D I also bought A&A Pacific so I wouldn’t have to pay for shipping. (I hope that will hold me over till the big dog comes out in October.)
I used the link provided by Imperious Leader. It was the cheapest place I have found it for.
LT
Where do i go to pre order for the anniversary edition? I have the pacific and european theaters plus 2nd edition and classic.
Is 2nd edition the same as classic? i cant remember.
-
Imperious Leader '17 '16 '15 Organizer '14 Customizer '13 '12 '11 '10last edited by Aug 2, 2008, 11:46 PM
http://www.coolstuffinc.com/main_boardGame.php?viewType=view board games&fp=Acc-BGAHAandAAnniversary
This is nothing like any other game before it. But its a new global version of Axis and Allies , much like Revised was to Classic
Nova 1st ed
MB 2nd edition
Hasbro 98 CD 3rd edition
Revised 4th edition
Anniversary 5th edition -
I prefer to think of it this way:
Nova version
Milton Bradley version - editions 1 through 3
Avalon Hill version - Revised and Anniversary editions -
Imperious Leader '17 '16 '15 Organizer '14 Customizer '13 '12 '11 '10last edited by Aug 3, 2008, 4:20 AM
how can nova be ‘zero’ edition… if people want to know whats the first version of AA, Nova is it. It must count as the first AA game.
If you look at MB it says its 2nd edition
and officially people call the 2 hit BB and Russia restricted the 3rd edition which was capitalized by the CD rom game in 1998
-
Nova isn’t a “zero edition”. It’s simply the first version of the game that was printed.
Yes, the Milton Bradley version says “2nd Edition” - now. Before 1986, it didn’t. The original MB version was quite a bit different. Among other things, it included Commander-in-Chief rules that allowed you to combine armies of different nationalities so one nation could control them and attack together with them. This was quite broken, as the Axis didn’t have much of a chance. It was the major impetus for the publication of the 2nd Edition rules.
-
I have to agree with IL here. Nova edition is usually known as 1st edition, while MB is the second or “Classic” edition.
Revised is notoriously known as 4th edition so the CD ROM one have to be the 3rd!!! -
Imperious Leader '17 '16 '15 Organizer '14 Customizer '13 '12 '11 '10last edited by Aug 3, 2008, 5:47 PM
it included Commander-in-Chief rules that allowed you to combine armies of different nationalities
your talking about that 4 page supplement from General M. Bradley? That was not in the original game. That showed up latter.
-
Since I’ve got married a hundred dollars is much more difficult justify for a game. If only i had people the play the game with!
-
@Imperious:
it included Commander-in-Chief rules that allowed you to combine armies of different nationalities
your talking about that 4 page supplement from General M. Bradley? That was not in the original game. That showed up latter.
No, I am talking about the 1st Edition of the Milton Bradley A&A rules that was first printed in 1984, which is currently on my desk in front of me. I can’t seem to find a copy on-line anywhere, though. Everyplace I can find only has the 2nd Edition rules, which I can only assume is because no one has played by the 1st Edition rules since 1986.
If you look at the Avalon Hill Rules Download page, you will see that it lists the 2nd Edition rules as “Axis & Allies, 1991 edition”. This is because the 2nd Edition rules were first published in 1986, and a supplement to them was added in 1991. The 1st Edition MB rules were first published when the game was in 1984.
-
I have to agree with IL here. Nova edition is usually known as 1st edition, while MB is the second or “Classic” edition.
Revised is notoriously known as 4th edition so the CD ROM one have to be the 3rd!!!I understand that people tend to think of this as the case, but there are two problems with this approach.
Firstly, there are three distinct editions of the MB version of the game - 1984, 1986 and 1997 (CD Edition). Given that, in order to call Revised “4th Edition” and remain consistent with “edition numbers”, the Nova version would need to be called (as Imperious alluded to earlier) “Edition Zero”. If you’re going to acknowledge the 1997 MB 3rd Edition, ignoring the existence of the 1984 MB 1st Edition is simply inconsistent and inaccurate.
Secondly, the Milton Bradley editions were all changes to the rules only, not to any of the game components (except for a small map change in 3rd Edition). This makes all three MB editions basically tweaks to the rules of the same game. However, it can be argued that the Nova and AH versions of A&A are completely different games from the MB version, since the maps and the rules themselves are significantly different. I have heard this argument made many times.
Given all that, it just makes sense (at least to me) that the different publishers’ incarnations of A&A should be called “versions” and the separate releases of the games within each publisher be called “editions”, as I outlined above. This precendent has, in effect, already been established by Milton Bradley. Of course, everyone is free to draw his or her own conclusion from the facts at hand.
-
Imperious Leader '17 '16 '15 Organizer '14 Customizer '13 '12 '11 '10last edited by Aug 4, 2008, 2:36 AM Aug 4, 2008, 2:01 AM
1984 and 1991 are essentially the same version. The only thing different is that clarifications sheet from General M. Bradley in 1991.
I have the 1984 rules and they don’t have anything about combining allies with commander in chief idea.
You have to credit the Nova Games edition as the first edition.
The only change thats tangible that arrived was the 98 Hasborg CD rom which had major changes regarding Russian restricted movement, Naval occupation, and 2 hit BB among other ideas. And since this was actually a product ( even if its not an actual board game) it too must be an edition to the game based also on its influence that carried over to Revised.
Before Revised came out, people were referring it as the 4th edition, but this moniker was not attributed to the title probably because that bum Mike S. didn’t want people to think he was helping larry make a new edition, but rather something totally new so he can gain more accolades as the new Axis and Allies guru. People knew better.
So basicially every new version of the global game that contains substantial new ideas should be credited as a new edition, making Anniversary edition the 5th incarnation of the global game. As i said before the handout of 1991 does not qualify as an independent game and was just a clarification sheet.
-
Imperious Leader '17 '16 '15 Organizer '14 Customizer '13 '12 '11 '10last edited by Aug 4, 2008, 2:38 AM Aug 4, 2008, 2:26 AM
http://www.dantiques.com/abgd/gamerules.mv?pag_num=1
under 1984 rules ( 2nd edition) it says: commander in chief rules are deleted.
But NOVA game does not have it….
we need to get to the bottom of this “commander in chief thing”
Suggested Topics
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/42030/420302711601976f97d13c7cedd95b638c09ac6c" alt=""