I summed this up in case anyone was interested… this includes AAA so it may be a bit skewed.
Japan: 556 +26 income
USA: 203 +17 income
UK: 106 +16 income
ANZAC: 84 +10 income
China: 61 +12 income
Thanks for the advice… As far as ANZAC forces are concerened I think its a great addition to the game but I just might suggest the U.K. player controlling ANZAC forces, unless there is a person who wants to play in the game but dosent want to controll large armies?
I think the UK will control ANZAC in the global game.
I would think Pacific would be best played by 3 people.
1-Japan 2-UK & Anzac 3-US & China.
I think all games are best played by 2 players only, 1 for Axie and 1 for Allies.
Whats the mater you only have one friend. lol :evil:
1 vs 1 is great, most of the games I played in the early days were that way, but 3-4 is more entertaining.
Honestly it is just easier with 2 players and I am kind of a control freak so I don’t like having other players on my side using strategies that I don’t agree with. Also sometimes it is hard to get that many players together with the time needed for A&A. As far as friends go, right now I wouldn’t even say that I have one.
I agree with BD, if you want to WIN play with less people if you want to have FUN play with more people. the more people you have the crazier and more fun the game is, thers a lot less strategy you have to consider when you are only one nation. but with two people you control every aspect of your side.
Try playing aganist yourself then you have a challenge. :lol:
Is that even possible?
Bobby Fisher played against himself all the time. Usually he couldn’t find a decent game with anyone around him.
yeah but didnt he go like batshit insane ? and insist on complete silence for EVERY game?
Years ago I actually did play a couple games solo just to try out strategies.
I did a couple solo games when I first got AA50 it seemed to help. Its kind weird when you set up a strat then change it just to mess your self up.