@Tall:
Guys,
––While Gargantua is completely correct, as he usually is, I just wanted to make a point:
----**In any game that I play in,….a Bomber will NEVER be allowed to “air transport” anything!**Â :-o
Not as long as we have highly detailed Air Transports available from HBG. Even if no HBG Russian, American, Japanese or German Air Transports were available,….I would write “Air Transport” on some tape, stick it on some aircraft turning them instantly and forever into Air Transports, and then proceed with the game.
----I don’t hold it against Gar, or anyone for that matter, :-D …but I can’t fathom anyone EVER wanting or preferring to use Bombers for dual-service units when we have actual AirTransports available that are also beautifully detailed to boot! IMHO, There should be distinct, different units that can “air transport”.
----Well, my ‘rant’ is over for the moment, anyway, haha. :-D It’s just that I strongly feel that the “Air Transport” should be a separate and distinctly different unit and I don’t believe enough “conversation” has been focosed on the topic.
Respectfuly,
“Tall Paul”
You noticed that the title did say transport plane?
I think he used bomber because some people may not have the HBG transport planes.
I do agree though that troops should be carried in transport planes, instead of bombers, and if someone doesn’t have transport planes, then they can do what you suggested.
Your right though, if someone can, they need to incorporate transport planes in their games. :-)