@Lord:
@Cmdr:
In exchange, maybe move the Med fleet to India. There should be no significant British pressence in the Med at the start of the game…puh-lease, if there should be a carrier there, give me a link showing me what HMS carrier was in the Med in 1940, otherwise, it’s a “crappy” placement, IMHO.
I’m sorry, I know this is so many pages back, and I apologise if someone already answered this, but um, Taranto? British Aircraft from HMS Illustrious bombed the Italian Fleet at anchor in its main base in Taranto in 1940. The British Mediterranean Fleet was actually quite large, having several battleships and actually more than one aircraft carrier, as HMS Glorious and the older carrier HMS Eagle were also there. What did you think the planes that attacked Taranto were launched from destroyers?
The Mediterranean was a traditional focus of British maritime power. Out-numbered by the forces of Regia Marina, the British plan was to hold the three decisive strategic points of Gibraltar, Malta, and the Suez Canal. By holding these points, the Mediterranean Fleet held open vital supply routes. Malta was the lynch-pin of the whole system. It provided a needed stop for Allied convoys and a base from which to attack the Axis supply routes.
Note: Regia Marina was the Italian Navy. Thus, it is said, the Italian navy had MORE ships than the British navy in the Med in 1940. So while there may have been a carrier present in the Med with which to launch an airial attack, the Italians had more ships than the British with which to absorb said attack. This is not represented on the game board.
The warships of the Royal Navy (Regia Marina) had a general reputation as well-designed. Italian small attack craft lived up to expectations and were responsible for many brave and successful actions in the Mediterranean.
So essentially, if we are to leave the British fleet in the Med, perhaps to be more historically accurate we should add more Italian destroyers. Thus the Italian fleet would “out-number” the British AND would be more representative of their “well-designed” and “brave” reputations?
More than 60 U-boats were sent to disrupt shipping in the sea, though many were already attacked at the Strait of Gibraltar controlled by Britain (of which nine were sunk while attempting passage and ten more were damaged).
Perhaps Germany should have a few U-Boats in the Med too? If we are going for realism.
Okay, so it’s probably a bit ridiculous to just add 2 Italian destroyers and 1 or 2 German U-boats, it would unbalance the game, I think. Unless it was rebalanced.
If you want it to be more realistic, then move the British fleet from SZ 98 to SZ 96, they were there to protect Malta, not Egypt. Add 2 destroyers and a cruiser to the Italian fleet in SZ 97, but remove the Battleship. Italy out numbered the British, but they were “well known” for their “highly effective small warships”. Further, add 1 or 2 German U-Boats in SZ 92 to represent the German campaign in the Med.
The state of the Malta defences was poor, verging on non-existent. This stemmed from a pre-war conclusion that the island was indefensible and should not be defended.
Given that information, remove the British infantry from Malta to represent the “poor” defenses. However, since it was the “lynch pin” in the Med (providing a way station between Egypt and Gibraltar) it is plausible to think there should be more aircraft present, so add a fighter. (Note, this fighter is more intended to counter the increased Naval units of Italy which has traded 1 battleship in for 2 destroyers and a cruiser. Italy + 7 punch - 4 Punch = 3 Punch, England + 3 Punch, it’s a wash with combat values, but Italy gets an added hit which should make the Italian fleet a bit more survivable.)
Above the single line, quotes are my thoughts, unquoted text comes from internet searches. Below the single line quoted text comes form internet searches.