I think the US NO for the Europe map would be better served in Africa.

What’s to deter Russia from attacking Japan? Nothing.

I don’t like the NO for US/UK in Paris. If the US and UK are in Paris after war has been going on for several turns, I concede as Germany. The NO is pointless.

You are confusing Romania with Bulgaria. Bulgaria is Neutral Pro-Axis.

Sounds like a game on steroids.

I like watching this unfold

The most up to date are in the original post. I update that as I see fit.

@thatonekid:

so it looks like im allies, start a forum and do germanies first buy  (oh, and list the rules that we’re doing this with, im still confused about where naval units can be placed and junk)

France always goes first in the placement rounds. Germany goes last.

I am trying to think of rules to avoid the “Super Stacks” on the front lines.

Yes but in the above setup, china is toast.

@taschuler:

• You can only place naval units in zones adjacent to your territories. In sea zones where opposing sides border the same sea zone, total up the adjacent land IPC value and the side with the highest value can place units in that sea zone.

• Germany may place a Sub in any neutral Atlantic sea zone, no more than one Sub per neutral sea zone

• A land territory can only have a number of ships adjacent to it equal to the IPC value of the territory. If the territory has a naval base in it, it will allow 3 additional naval units to be placed in adjacent waters.

Wow, you guys don’t like to use chips do you? :^)

I added the above naval rules the other day. I point that out mostly for SZ20 on your board. With the above rule additions, it would belong to the UK, and the UK could place a maximum of 6 units in that zone. The third rule would reduce the massive naval stacks.

Thank you for posting the pics.

Upon first glance the game looks much more volatile. Massive battles in the first round.

China stands very little chance.

Keep us up to date with the outcome.