Generally pacific builds consists of a 2 to 1 ratio of subs-destroyer. Following turn is 5-6 bombers. This forces Japan to start building fleet instead of troops for India/China crush.
I just had to give som additional thumbs up fo9r this comment :D Buying other combat ships than subs, dds (Or CW + ftrs) is rarely correct. the 2 to 1 ratio shos that sean knows how fodder works and how it is the most important thing in these battles.
The only reason to stop buying the subs is if japan for some reason dont respond with fleetbuilding and only buys planes instead. But then you should win anyways :D
which is why i said that it didn’t work against a too planeheavy japan. on theory, the DDs + other surface ships ofc needs to be enough to stop all the planes of japan + 2 rounds of plane only builds of japan.
What would prevent japan from attacking your fleet of subs-destroyers with air and a few destroyers. With 20+ planes they can whipe out your whole fleet with minimal losses as subs cant even hit the planes.
I normaly go for a carrier heavy fleet followed by subs destroyers for attacking power. Ideally i want my carriers to bait an early attack from japan that i can crush in the counter and get his carriers and BB out of the way so anzac and UKP can clean up the rest.
Global Homebrew Setup Charts
-
It’s 3 for german land unit in Egypt in the global game.
-
Do you plan to create a set for Europe?
-
Downloading right now. Thank you for the effort. Great work.
Cheers
Quark
-
I like them, tough to choose which is better, yours of Bobs.
-
Could you make another card with the political situation?
-
Could you make another card with the political situation?
Working on one! I don’t know how it will turn out, but if it’s cool, I’ll post it up here!
-
Could you make another card with the political situation?
Working on one! I don’t know how it will turn out, but if it’s cool, I’ll post it up here!
Thanks. We all appreciate your hard work!
-
Ok, here is something I came up with for the political situations. The main idea here is to use this as a quick reference, not to completely replace the rulebook. I know that I took some liberties by not including some fundamental rules in here, but I think all of the main situations that directly affect gameplay are included. Let me know if you like this layout, or if something in here needs to be fixed that could affect gameplay. Thanks again!
-
Ok, here is something I came up with for the political situations. The main idea here is to use this as a quick reference, not to completely replace the rulebook. I know that I took some liberties by not including some fundamental rules in here, but I think all of the main situations that directly affect gameplay are included. Let me know if you like this layout, or if something in here needs to be fixed that could affect gameplay. Thanks again!
This looks excellent. Was expecting a few sentences for each power, but this looks much better
-
BTW, which rules did you not include in the political chart
-
Printed it out…
6 russian inf in Amur missing
6 russian inf in Sakha missing
6 russian inf in Buryata missing -
Checked the complete European setup.
There is one american airbase and one american naval base too much in Central USA.
-
6 russian inf in Amur missing
6 russian inf in Sakha missing
6 russian inf in Buryata missingThere is one american airbase and one american naval base too much in Central USA.
Thanks, these have been fixed. All of the changes so far to the cards have been fixed and posted to the web page. Also, I finished up the Political Situations reference and posted that as well. Let me know what you think about it. Sorry about the mistakes, like I said, it’s been real busy around here lately!
-
My understanding form Krieg was that Dutch territories are taken during the non combat phase by either ANZAC / UK as the other “pro” neutrals.
-
My understanding form Krieg was that Dutch territories are taken during the non combat phase by either ANZAC / UK as the other “pro” neutrals.
I was under the impression that the takeover part had to be done in the combat phase. Correct me if I’m wrong, though.
EDIT: Ok, I went back and reviewed the clarifications on the Dutch, and have modified the chart to reflect a UK/ANZAC land unit takeover during the non-combat phase.
If I tried making these without posting them here for all of you to comb over, they would be a mess! Thanks for all the input!
-
just printed mine out and they look great. thanks again!
Suggested Topics
