Naval bases may only be built in territories that are adjacent to sea zones.
:roll: So I was wrong on a totally meaningless rule!
Betcha can’t buy more than one base per tty either, right? :roll:
kdfsjljk… Just buy extra AA guns at the new discounted price of 5 IPC’s (per Alpha +.2 anyway) and stockpile them in the same territory where they would be redundant. That’s a good way to show off.
Here’s a better idea: spend it on as many factories as you can buy. For example, japan can buy a minor for each Chinese tt, the US for Alaska, Mexico, and Brazil, UK for Egypt, Persia, Ontario, Scotland, West India, and malaya, Germany for its European holdings and Russia for all its Southern 2 ipc tt.
Buying a fleet for the Caspian Sea is a good way to show your wealth and rub it in :-D
Or a fleet in the Great lakes or Lake Ladoga or Lake Biakal(all illegal anyway)
Naval bases may only be built in territories that are adjacent to sea zones.
:roll: So I was wrong on a totally meaningless rule!
Betcha can’t buy more than one base per tty either, right? :roll:
kdfsjljk… Just buy extra AA guns at the new discounted price of 5 IPC’s (per Alpha +.2 anyway) and stockpile them in the same territory where they would be redundant. That’s a good way to show off.
Here’s a better idea: spend it on as many factories as you can buy. For example, japan can buy a minor for each Chinese tt, the US for Alaska, Mexico, and Brazil, UK for Egypt, Persia, Ontario, Scotland, West India, and malaya, Germany for its European holdings and Russia for all its Southern 2 ipc tt.
The point is for it to be pointless though. IC’s aren’t. Unless I put one in greenland. That might work.
Naval bases may only be built in territories that are adjacent to sea zones.
:roll: So I was wrong on a totally meaningless rule!
Betcha can’t buy more than one base per tty either, right? :roll:
kdfsjljk… Just buy extra AA guns at the new discounted price of 5 IPC’s (per Alpha +.2 anyway) and stockpile them in the same territory where they would be redundant. That’s a good way to show off.
Here’s a better idea: spend it on as many factories as you can buy. For example, japan can buy a minor for each Chinese tt, the US for Alaska, Mexico, and Brazil, UK for Egypt, Persia, Ontario, Scotland, West India, and malaya, Germany for its European holdings and Russia for all its Southern 2 ipc tt.
The point is for it to be pointless though. IC’s aren’t. Unless I put one in greenland. That might work.
They are pointless if you never use them…
Only in AA42 and earlier games could you build ICs on 0 or 1 ipc territories.
Only in AA42 and earlier games could you build ICs on 0 or 1 ipc territories.
Yep, definitely harder to waste money now. Buy tech!!! Spending 20 on tech with ANZAC sends a message, right Calvin? :-D
Only in AA42 and earlier games could you build ICs on 0 or 1 ipc territories.
Yep, definitely harder to waste money now. Buy tech!!! Spending 20 on tech with ANZAC sends a message, right Calvin? :-D
I recall spending over 15.
Anyway, apparently, this is an example of one of the reasons I should kill myself.
Calvin, don’t do it!!! :-P
Just noticed something when reading the scramble section again.
Can you only scramble when an island with an airbase is being attacked?
If so are Japan, Australia, and Britain islands?
Does China have an actual capital for the Axis to take over and take China’s IPCs?
In OOB, only islands can scramble. Japan is an island; Oz and the UK are not.
China has no capital and doesn’t lose ipcs.
In the Alpha.+1 rules under the new scramble rules.
Can different countries all scramble together as along as there are no more then 3 fighters? So like a combination of two U.S and one U.K. fighters on a U.K. island or coastal territory
yes
Here is the scenerio U.S. want to invade German coastal territory A. The sea zone the U.S. is invading from is touching both territory A and territory B. Territory B has an airbase with fighters on it. Can Germany scramble fighters from territory B even though the attack is on territory A?
Does the attacker have to assign where everything is going before the defender decides to scramble? Meaning you better have enough protection at sea if you send everything inland for an invasion.
Here is the scenerio U.S. want to invade German coastal territory A. The sea zone the U.S. is invading from is touching both territory A and territory B. Territory B has an airbase with fighters on it. Can Germany scramble fighters from territory B even though the attack is on territory A?
Does the attacker have to assign where everything is going before the defender decides to scramble? Meaning you better have enough protection at sea if you send everything inland for an invasion.
Only planes from A can scramble unless the US is also invading B.(This is for Alpha + 0.1)
Yes, Germany decides how much to scramble after the US moves its units; thus, you better have enough forces to win against all those planes whether they go into the sea zone or stay on land.
Here is the scenerio U.S. want to invade German coastal territory A. The sea zone the U.S. is invading from is touching both territory A and territory B. Territory B has an airbase with fighters on it. Can Germany scramble fighters from territory B even though the attack is on territory A?
OOB - Yes.
Alpha+.1 - Only if there is a sea battle before the assault.
Here is the scenerio U.S. want to invade German coastal territory A. The sea zone the U.S. is invading from is touching both territory A and territory B. Territory B has an airbase with fighters on it. Can Germany scramble fighters from territory B even though the attack is on territory A?
OOB - Yes.
Alpha+.1 - Only if there is a sea battle before the assault.
OOB is only yes if B is an island.
True.
A mech wants to blitz from A through B into C. A tank accompanies the mech by moving from D through B into C. Is this allowed? I don’t think so, since I’m sure that the tank must accompany the mech for its entire move, but I wanted to be sure.
You’re right, it’s not allowed.
So I guess this rule was Larry’s intent? It doesn’t explicitly say this in the rules. It just indicates the mech inf must “move along” with the blitzing tank. There is no passage (that I can find) that suggests that they must originate in the same territory.
