How did playtesters miss J1 attack?

Plain and simple, if you think that the Japanese turn one attack is to powerful then make a Japanese turn 2 or 3 attack.  If you beat a videogame on easy mode and keep playing it over and over again on easy mode you can’t really complain.  The option is already there to up the difficulty.  Our gaming group have never once used the same opening attack twice in a row so we don’t have that issue, and we’re not the biggest fans of the turn on attack anyways, cause we find it forces Japan to race forward before all it’s peives are in place

Also, you want more than vague assurances of pairity, give me a detailed script to follow and I’ll give you back what I would do to counter it.  You gave a basic 10 point 10 turn summary and we tried it out four times and the allies won three times.  I’m not offering to play you to just to beat you, but because you asked for help and I was interested it helping you figured out an allied plan to beat you Japanese moves.  That’s the only way I’ll be able to remotely convince you, 'cause no matter what anyone says you keep replying “the Japanese can counter that”.  So either have a game/strategy session or stop asking.

Jim, I’ll play you to try out new moves if you like, let me know when and how and we’ll do battle.

Well I played as Japan again. Pleaded with them to let me play USA, but one guy really wanted to try USA. So it was me vs 3 opponents, 2 had played before, the third an experienced A&A player.
Gave them the immediate 40 IPC boost to USA as game balance.

USA player was overconfident and brought out his initial fleet to Hawaii. Was building loaded CVs+ mixed DDs, SS and occasional CA each turn. I moved a third of my fleet to Truk to stare him down.

He attacked the third of my fleet at truk (plus 4 fighters scrambled on defense). Should have been a mutual wipe out but he rolled amazing dice (and I rolled miserably, 1 hit for 6 4’s, 3 3’s, 2 2’s)  and crushed my fleet. I had built 6 SS turn 1 so I was able to counter attack effectively.
He continued to offer up his US fleet piecemeal so there was never a chance for the allies.

UK used CV build turn 1. He decided to take out 4 Japanese TT’s UK2 but the net effect was DD, CA, CV, 2 fighters lost for 4 TT’s + 1 DD + 1 sub.
At that point UK was out of the game.

Final turn (I think J6) I captured the last China Territory with its final defensive stack, India with UK final defensive stack, Sydney(under-defended but with
ANZAC in a position to retake) and completely destroyed USN off Hawaii.
Never had 4 decisive attacks against all 4 allies on same turn before.

With the exception of a couple of China attacks, Japan had average or worse dice the entire game. It lasted about 3 hours.

@kungfujew:

Also, you want more than vague assurances of pairity, give me a detailed script to follow and I’ll give you back what I would do to counter it.  You gave a basic 10 point 10 turn summary and we tried it out four times and the allies won three times.

OK, I’ll post the opening Japanese move we’re using:

_J1 buy= 3 x transports & 1 x Arty, bank 1.

JPN BMR FROM SHANTUNG TO SZ 37, LANDS IN KWANGSI
1 JPN BMR FROM JAPAN TO SZ 37, LANDS KWANGSI
1 JPN BMR FROM JAPAN TO SZ 47, LANDS TRUK
JPN BMR FROM MANCHURIA TO SZ 37, LANDS KWANGSI

JPN FTR & DB FROM CV IN SZ 33 MOVES TO THE LAND BATTLE IN THE PI AND LANDS ON 1 CV MOVING TO SZ 35 FROM SZ 6. THE CV FROM SZ33 MOVES TO SZ 44 AND RECOVERS THE FTR & DB FROM THE CV THAT STARTED IN SZ 6 AND MOVED TO SZ 35. THESE TWO CVs EFFECTIVELY “SWAP” PLANES IN THE PROCESS.

JPN DD FROM SZ 33 MOVES TO SZ 47 TO ATTACK THE ANZAC SS THERE ALONG WITH THE BMR FROM JAPAN.

JPN SS IN SZ 6 MOVES TO SZ 26 AND KILLS THE US TRANSPORT THERE

2 X JPN TRANSPORTS IN SZ 6 MOVE TO THE PI AND TAKE 2 X MEN & 2 X ARTY. I LIKE TO TAKE A TANK INSTEAD OF TWO ARTY, BUT I DON’T THINK IT INCREASES THE ODDS ANY, AND I HAVE SWITCHED OVER TO TIMS (BB) MOVE OF TAKING TWO ARTY, AND SAVING THE TANK TO MOVE ON THE TRANSPORTS TO ATTACK SINGAPORE ON J3.

JPN TRANSPORT IN SZ 33 MOVES TO SZ 44WITH THE TROOP ON TRUK & GRABS THE TROOP ON PAULAU AND TAKES CELEBES.

JPN BB IN SZ 33 MOVES TO SZ 44

ALL THE REST OF THE JPN FLEET MOVES TO SZ 35, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE DD IN SZ 19, WHICH MOVES TO SZ 6, AND THE JPN SS IN SZ 19, WHICH SOMETIMES MOVES TO SZ 6, SOMETIMES TO SZ35. FIELDERS CHOICE.

THE JPN FTR & DB FROM THE 2ND CARRIER IN SZ 6 JOIN THE NAVAL BATTLE IN SZ 35.

3 MEN & ARTY FROM KWANGSI MOVE TO ATTACK YUNNAN WITH THE FTR & DB FROM SHANTUNG, WHICH LAND IN KWANGSI

JPN FTR FROM TAIWAN TO SZ 37, LANDS IN KWANGSI SIAM IF IT SURVIVES.

2 INF & ARTY FROM JEHOL MOVE TO CHARHAR

THIS IS ANOTHER AREA OF CHOICE. I USED TO LIKE TO MOVE 1 X INF FROM KAINGSI TO HUNAN, THE OTHER 2 INF & ARTY TO HONG KONG. BB (TIM) LIKES TO MOVE 2 INF FROM KAINGSI TO HUNAN, AND 1 INF & ARTY TO HONG KONG. I’M LIKING TIMS MOVE BETTER AND BETTER, AS IT SETS UP MORE TROOPS TO ATTACK YUNNAN ON J2.

SHANTUNG INF TO ANHWE

KIANGSU INF TO ANHWE

ALL MANCHURI LAND UNITS TO JEHOL (INCLUDING THE AA GUN), MECH INF TO ANHWE.

KOREA INF TO MANCHURIA

SIAM INF TO VIETNAM. BB LIKES TO TAKE JUST 1 INF, I LIKE TAKING THEM BOTH TO HAVE AVAILABLE TO COUNTERATTCK YUNNAN IF NEEDED ON J2.

1 FTR & 1 DB FROM MANCHURIA TO HUNAN, LAND KWANGSI

FTR OKINAWA TO HONG KONG, LAND KWANGSI

2 X FTR & 1 DB  FROM MANCHURIA TO HONG KONG, LAND KWANGSI

2 X FTR & 2 X DB FROM JAPAN TO TRUK

3 X FTR & 2 X DB STAY AT JAPAN

6 X INF & 1 ARMOR REMAIN ON JAPAN, GAINING THE J1 ARTY

THE 3 X TRANSPORTS COME ON AT JAPAN, OBVIOUSLY

JAPAN GOES TO 41~~/42~~ DEPENDING ON WHETHER THEY TAKE HUNAN._

@kungfujew:

Also, you want more than vague assurances of pairity, give me a detailed script to follow and I’ll give you back what I would do to counter it.

Start typing.

And don’t get the idea that I’m at all interested in playing you here. As I said before, I only play amongst friends, and I don’t do the online games at all. If I can’t sit down and drink a beer with you, then I have absolutely no interest at all in playing a game with you.

Beyond this point in the game, it is all speculation as to what the die rolls will be.

@calvinhobbesliker:

The ftr from Formosa must land on Siam. It’s 3 moves to Z37, and there’s no airbase

Nice catch! :-)

Damn, I thought I had the whole move memorized! Not quite! I haven’t even had a beer yet, so I can’t blame it on that! :lol:

Oh well, I’m on vacation as of 4 hours ago, might as well go grab a cold one now! :-P

Formosa is Taiwan, right? Or is Taiwan Hainan? I get those mixed up. I thought the fighter started on Hainan, and thought that was Taiwan, but you’re right, that ftr starts on Formosa, which may wind up being Taiwan after all! :-o :-D

Formosa = Taiwan

@gamerman01:

Formosa = Taiwan

Thanks, correction noted.

@calvinhobbesliker:

How does Japan make 42? They start with 26+2 for Phil+3 for Hong+ 3 for Cel+2 for FIC+4 Chinese tt=40+1 saved=41

Stop doing that!  :-D :oops: :-D :-D :-D

You’re right again of course, 41 if Japan takes Hunan. I’m no good at this when I’m sober. :-o

Correction noted…again.

By Calvinhobbesliker…again.  :-D  :-D  :-D

Look, I’ll buy you a 6 pack if you stop finding mistakes! :-D :-D :-D

Other than minor differences here or there, Kaufschtick has outlined the J1 “Book Move”

I prefer to use the 4th bomber against Yunan instead of the New Britain SS, for example.

Allied response should be aware of the fact that the Japanese TT’s at PI sea zone can move 3 spaces next turn because of captured seabase.

@Van_Trump:

Other than minor differences here or there, Kaufschtick has outlined the J1 “Book Move”

I prefer to use the 4th bomber against Yunan instead of the New Britain SS, for example.

Allied response should be aware of the fact that the Japanese TT’s at PI sea zone can move 3 spaces next turn because of captured seabase.

You know, the only thing remotely tricky about the way we do it is the fighter “swap” from the planes hitting the PI.

The rest of the move is straight forward. Where you want the second sub to go, do you attack the ANZAC sub, how do you distribute your air in China, do you leave an inf in Siam, stuff like that…well, there are a lot of little considerations in there that make the opening Japanese move a matter of preference, not a stone cold script.

I think some people see my posts in particular and think, “Oh, this guy thinks he’s a Billy Bad A$$, eh? Well, we’ll see about that! Show me your move and I’ll show you how I’d beat it!”

But it’s not about a particular move. Its the general situation on turn one. The Japanese are in such a strong position that they are able to accomplish several very important goals that will lay the groundwork for a Japanese win. This may not happen until around turn 7-9, or even a little later depending on events.

You still have to play the game, but it gets old having to make perfect move after perfect move for the Allies just to get to the next turn, and if the Japanese player is good, you’ve got long odds of having any chance to win at all.

Another good post, Kauf…

I agree that the effective J1 (achieving all those objectives - I think it was you who put them up) is pretty straight-forward and not real hard to see.  I think Van_Trump just meant that your move does pretty much all the things that need to be done - that’s what he meant by “book move”, I think.  If a textbook was written about this game, it would say to make pretty much all those attacks (definitely Phillipines, Hong Kong, Yunnan, take empty Chinese TT, sink American transport, probably even ANZAC DD and TP…).  I mean, I made all those attacks (except on ANZAC) the very first time I played this game, without reading anything before hand, and I’m sure almost all experienced A&A players would do the same.

Van_Trump, I actually took all 4 bombers after the battleship on J1 the last time I played, to ensure it didn’t get two shots off.  I lost one bomber, so could land the rest in Kwa.

Also, I took CV, BB and FTR down to ANZAC “fleet” (snicker) along with the Tac that had finished toasting the ANZAC sub.  My capable opponent chose not to counterattack with ANZAC air, even though my BB got dinged.  It eventually got repaired at Singapore…

I think I’ll play a delayed J attack when I want higher difficulty, like one of you guys had suggested.  It’s just that I am sure the designers meant for it to be a hard choice of when to attack, but it appears to be a no-brainer (not a hard choice at all).  J1 is easy setting, J2 is medium, J3 is hard, J4 extreme  :lol:

I will have to try them, but I cannot imagine how you could gain a better position on the Allied players by waiting, when they’re earning so much more money than you.  The best position you’re gonna get is gonna be right there at J1 - Phillipines, Hong Kong, British and ANZAC fleets all served up for you on a silver platter!!  :lol:

If the designers wanted to make a J1 a hard decision, maybe they shouldn’t have put a Strat bomber on the Phillipines, or two UK transports and a BB sitting at Singapore, or making it necessary for the UK to have Hong Kong to get an NO!

Hmmmm…  I can’t remember - I know I’ve seen the history of a BB battle between the UK and Japan around Singapore…  Anyone remember how that went?  I should look it up, here…
OK, got it.  It was the Prince of Wales and it was sent to Singapore in October of 1941, sunk on December 10, 1941 by Jap 86 land-based bombers and fighters……

Now that I found that out, I’m wondering what naval force the Brits actually had stationed at Singapore in 1940!  Looking it up next…

@gamerman01:

Another good post, Kauf…

I agree that the effective J1 (achieving all those objectives - I think it was you who put them up) is pretty straight-forward and not real hard to see.  I think Van_Trump just meant that your move does pretty much all the things that need to be done - that’s what he meant by “book move”, I think.  If a textbook was written about this game, it would say to make pretty much all those attacks (definitely Phillipines, Hong Kong, Yunnan, take empty Chinese TT, sink American transport, probably even ANZAC DD and TP…).  I mean, I made all those attacks (except on ANZAC) the very first time I played this game, without reading anything before hand, and I’m sure almost all experienced A&A players would do the same.

Oh yeah, I’m right with you on Van Trumps post, thats how I took it too. Its just that I thought it was interesting that when he said “book move”, and it is, that when you stop and think about it, there are quite a number of little decisions in there that many people will play differently.

Van Trumps right, over all its the “book move”, but its not a locked in stone kinda deal, and I think some folks may read it that way, like some kind of super move.

From some of Van Trumps posts, it almost feels like he’s been playing games with Tim and myself! I think my view of the game is very nearly the same as his though, at least many of his comments and opinions are dead on the same as my own.

And you yourself said that you made many of those same moves right out of the gates, so it’s not like there is some kinda diabolical move going down on J1. And its certainly not the case that I’m trying to brag myself, about the Japanese being so tough, it’s just the way it is.

There have been a couple people that have posted in the threads and all they want to bring to the conversation is “Aw hell, I’ll beat you”, and they have no clue as to what the actual discusion is.

Anyway, this time tomorrow night, I should be 3/4 turns into game 01 of maybe 5/6, or even more. We’re going with the US immediate 40. :-)

@kaufschtick:

And you yourself said that you made many of those same moves right out of the gates, so it’s not like there is some kinda diabolical move going down on J1. And its certainly not the case that I’m trying to brag myself, about the Japanese being so tough, it’s just the way it is.

There have been a couple people that have posted in the threads and all they want to bring to the conversation is “Aw hell, I’ll beat you”, and they have no clue as to what the actual discusion is.

Yes, I understand you.

It’s not easy to find the UK naval strength at Singapore in 1940….  but it was interesting reading about how the Jap leader just totally bluffed the Allied forces into thinking they were vastly out-numbered, when in fact they had 3 times the forces…  Seems there were disagreements among British command, and the guy who said they needed to fight to the bitter end was not listened to… etc etc

But in my P40 game the Allied troops listened!!  Good grief, I wiped them out in one round of combat, but the Allies hit me 4 out of 5 on 2’s!  So much for history - hehe.

But given the 1940 setup and how a J1 attack accomplishes so many vital objectives, while the game mechanic gives you some reasons for delaying that attack, it’s very disappointing to find out that a J1 attack is so superior - taking the hard decision out of the game (that was intended to be there).  So I’m curious now, about what kind of navy the UK actually had at Singapore in 1940.  Maybe their fleet should just be relocated.  Not as dramatic as giving the US an immediate 40, but is along those lines, kind of.  Actually, maybe it’s more similar than it seems…  2 transports and all those money islands…

I think that with the introduction of the global version of the game that it will make that decision a lot more difficult than it is now. I think that is the problem with the game, it was designed as a global game but sold piecemeal instead. I still think that the allies can win without a bid but like many people have said that the only way that happens is if the Japs make a mistake or two. Without that Russian horde threatening invasion it allows Japan to run wild around Asia with no recourse.

@maverick_76:

I think that with the introduction of the global version of the game that it will make that decision a lot more difficult than it is now. I think that is the problem with the game, it was designed as a global game but sold piecemeal instead. I still think that the allies can win without a bid but like many people have said that the only way that happens is if the Japs make a mistake or two. Without that Russian horde threatening invasion it allows Japan to run wild around Asia with no recourse.

I think you’re right about the global game being sold in 2 halves, but the makers were adamant that P40 was fine as a stand-alone game.  Well, it would be fine if the rules and setup were customized a bit more (for a Pacific only game).  But as it stands now, they appear to have failed in “missing” the J1 attack as being the most desirable choice for the Axis player (the subject of this thread).

There’s a very good summary of the game on board-game geek.com - look for the summary with the most votes.  He estimates 60% Jap victory, and that they need to attack on J1.  Others are disagreeing with him, saying 60% Allied victory, but not saying if that’s with a J1 attack!  Check it out…

I did research 1940 naval forces of the Allies…  Can’t find anything about transports, because the focus is on warships, but I don’t see anything about any battleships being in Singapore in 1940.  There were some warships, but not battleships.  Also, Australia had heavy and light cruisers, etc.  India had various warships as well (DD and CA seems about right - as in the game)

So…  It does seem we’re playing only half of a game, and the rules were not adequately customized to really make this one stand on its own as intended!  :x  This seems to be the conclusion of many of us here…  Is it August yet?? :lol:

Almost.  :-o

@kungfujew:

Also, you want more than vague assurances of pairity, give me a detailed script to follow and I’ll give you back what I would do to counter it.

Well?!

Still waiting here.