• @cminke:

    oh i…oh … haha… i did not  know…i did not see that…?..what!? oh wrong poll!..i must have …um…picked the new one opps!

    Why……do…you…put…elipses…between …every…few…words???


  • @calvinhobbesliker:

    @cminke:

    oh i…oh … haha… i did not  know…i did not see that…?..what!? oh wrong poll!..i must have …um…picked the new one opps!

    Why……do…you…put…elipses…between …every…few…words???

    Dude, William cminke is William Shatner!!!  Awesome!!!    8-)


  • @cminke:

    @purplebaron:

    @calvinhobbesliker:

    @cminke:

    oh i…oh … haha… i did not  know…i did not see that…?..what!? oh wrong poll!..i must have …um…picked the new one opps!

    Why……do…you…put…elipses…between …every…few…words???

    Dude, William cminke is William Shatner!!!  Awesome!!!    8-)

    wht does that mean??

    Well, Shatner is a Canadian too and he often puts long or awkward pauses between words in his lines.  He exaggerates this sometimes in his Priceline commercials now. :wink:


  • 42.9% have voted that the game is balanced or Japan should receive the bid.

    sigh

    @Imperious:

    AAp40 did not consider any historical setup and instead tried to impose a new set of victory conditions that could make it compatible with a global game concept as a plug and play. With no need for ‘special rules’ That game needs new victory conditions akin to AAP and a historical setup. Balance would come from raising or lowering the US wartime income IMO.

    So i advocate the solution is an entirely new setup ( definatly less pieces) and Historical, with the balance hinging on how much US wartime income will balance. Japanese VC would be for X points with every 10 IPC a turn generating 1 Point and no NO’s National Objectives are a cheesy way of rewarding historical play patterns and awarding cash if you ‘perform’ like Japan did in the war.

    Where do we go to start “chanting” for this to happen? The Harris website?


  • @Yoper:

    I think that some aren’t fully versed as to the theory of the bid.

    And some just won’t accept the bid concept as necessary.

    Or they can’t accept the idea that the game could actually be produced without it being balanced!

    It is what it is.

    Yeah, I think you’re right. I t did take quite some time for us to come to the conclussion that there was a problem with the game. And you have to get in quite a few games as well, before you can see the pattern develope.


  • @kaufschtick:

    @Yoper:

    I think that some aren’t fully versed as to the theory of the bid.

    And some just won’t accept the bid concept as necessary.

    Or they can’t accept the idea that the game could actually be produced without it being balanced!

    It is what it is.

    Yeah, I think you’re right. I t did take quite some time for us to come to the conclussion that there was a problem with the game. And you have to get in quite a few games as well, before you can see the pattern develope.

    Perhaps you should edit the poll so that people can change their votes so that it can change as people do more testing.

  • Customizer

    I stick to what I said before … the bid is likely $24 or more.

    The game is perfectly balanced … if the Japanese player doesn’t screw up!

  • TripleA

    @jim010:

    I stick to what I said before … the bid is likely $24 or more.

    The game is perfectly balanced … if the Japanese player doesn’t screw up!

    24ipc sounds high to me.

    are you playing only one bid unit per territory?
    what units and where are you placing your 24ipc bid?

    if you place bid of 4inf and 3art in yunnan, j can not attack it j1. china and uk can stack yunnan with more units stopping a j2 attack of yunnan, this move should win the allies the game.

  • Customizer

    Yunnan gets smoked turn 2 if putting the money there.  If I want it bad enough, I can get the bombers on it.  3 inf, 1 art, 1 fht, 1 tac, 4 bmb will crush it.  Letting the BB go in sz37 won’t help much either.

    I can’t get a stack to survive there early in the game.

  • TripleA

    @jim010:

    Yunnan gets smoked turn 2 if putting the money there.  If I want it bad enough, I can get the bombers on it.  3 inf, 1 art, 1 fht, 1 tac, 4 bmb will crush it.  Letting the BB go in sz37 won’t help much either.

    I can’t get a stack to survive there early in the game.

    if you wait until turn 2 yunnan has 17inf, 3art, 5fig, 1tac defending it. you could forgo attacking uk bb and attack yunnan but then you take it with 4 units left over so you lose 2planes or 3 planes if you want to hold the territory and let the uk have transports and a bb. if you place the entire 24ipc in yunnan the allies will win.

Suggested Topics

  • 2
  • 6
  • 5
  • 15
  • 74
  • 69
  • 9
  • 19
Axis & Allies Boardgaming Custom Painted Miniatures

170

Online

17.4k

Users

40.0k

Topics

1.7m

Posts