@FranceNeedsMorePower France only needs a infantry in Normandy.
AARHE: Phase 3: Revised NA's
-
Oh I see what changes now. Oh well.
Where’s Imperious Leader? -
I’m here… this looks real good! still studying it.
-
Imperious>
lol still studying?
Gen Patch finish the list a while agoGen Patch>
good you found my suggestions
read the latest AARHE draft if you haven’t, or you may not see why some items don’t fit
the document is long, I hope you can read when you have the timeas mentioned before we could have an Italy NA to represent Romania’s effort on the Russian front
-
yea we need some NA’s for :
finland , bulgaria, hungary, and rumania these go with italy but the finland one should go with germany
-
Balkan Supply Fields
During World War 2, during the time when the Balkan Countries were Axis Satellites they supplied front line units with much needed Food and Fuel from their country’s stockpile.
During the Combat move phase any Ground unit that is in The Balkans is considered to be “mechanized”. It may move up to 2 spaces but it may not blitz.This will represent Romania, Bulgaria, and Hungary…
Finnish Ski Troops
During the Winter War Finland Ski Troops were known for there resilience in all combat conditions and there ability to strike and fade.
Each Defending Axis Infantry in Finland-Norway gets to roll a sneak attack for the first round of combat. Consequently the defender rolls first. -
Yea those are good especially the finnish troops NA. I was thinking about making all soviet attacks on finland require 2 hits to make one hit or something like that.
-
Sissi (Ski Troops) were in essence Guerrilla Operators, but on larger scales then any other Guerrilla Operation in WW2… So that is why I made them sneak attack… I think Russia won’t even come near it if it takes 2 hits… That is more of a tech ability imho…
I like the Balkans Supply Fields the Best, personally it spells the essence of what that area meant to the Wermacht especially on the Eastern Front…
GG
-
sneak attack first cycle is fine
2 hits to kill is gonna be too powerful, especially for the no-Italy map where Norway and Finland is one territory -
earlier post of sugguested changes
mostly due to other rules of AARHE
http://www.axisandallies.org/forums/index.php?topic=6385.msg119114#msg119114 -
map where Norway and Finland is one territory
in phase 3 map finland is a seperate nation
-
yeah so ok for phase 3 but too powerful for phase 2 map
and probably better one rule for phase 2 and 3so once you guys go thru the list of NAs post your comments
I’ve already did here
http://www.axisandallies.org/forums/index.php?topic=6385.msg119114#msg119114 -
What about GG’s ideas on Finland and Rumania NA’s i think we should include them. Gen patch what do you think?
-
Balkan Supply Fields
so land units have to be already in Balkans to be able to move 2?
or would be it be too powerful to let infantry/artillery move 1 more after reaching Balkans?we could model Axis forces assembling in Balkans before pushing East, or Axis forces getting resupply in Balkans
-
Yeah, but that allows them to go to West Russia or Caucasus…
I personally want them to have the big jump after they get there for the reason you mentioned below that… That is why it is written the way it is, and, to reiterate:During the Combat move phase any Ground unit that is in The Balkans is considered to be “mechanized”. It may move up to 2 spaces but it may not blitz.
GG
-
so hows this coming along?
has anyone digested my proposed changes?
-
This NA is not much of an advantage. Thats just my opinion.
-
by the way I was takling my proposed changes here
http://www.axisandallies.org/forums/index.php?topic=6385.msg119114#msg119114
in regards to the long list of NAs posted by Gen AlexanderPatch -
anyone seen Gen AlexanderPatch ?
-
LOL he disappeared… i talked to Micoom and sent him the files. The files are going on boardgamegeek and on this site soon. they are also going on AH forums.
-
Here’s an interesting question that arose during a game today. One of Russia’s national advantages was the non-aggression treaty. Japan ran a strategic bombing attack on Moscow. Does this violation of the treaty mean Russia puts 4 troops on Moscow? That’s how we played it, though it seems to be in violation of the spirit of the rule.
Suggested Topics
