@Imperious:
How can you possibly interpret the correction of “genealogy” as a statement on the quality of leadership
- Can you answer my question first?
- what correction are you referring to? ( yes wilhelm II is the gradson of wilhelm I and your point is?)
- why wouldn’t it not be possible you have two great leaders from the same bloodline?
- why are you trying to debate my opinion of their leadership qualities? WE can do this… do you want a debate?.. then lets start another thread.
- What is your opinion of wilhelm I and II as leaders?
- lets not turn this into another one of your stink bombs with the result of another closed topic as the fitting result. play nice!
No, the obvious one that even you noted and corrected silently, who cares, i am not, why would you care, why do place a stink bomb when oyu don’t want one ?
@Imperious:
I THINK HE is refering to the fact that Wilhelm II was the son of Frederick III and grandson of wilhelm I, but they are all in fact the ruling family during the entire period of the “Kaiserreich” from 1871-1918. Not quite unlike the Hohenzollern dynasty or the Hapsburgs of Austria. Other than that i think hes fallen out of bed again…woe to the rest of us!
Yes, that was what i refered to. You made another mistake. I corrected you. You pretend you never made that mistake and pull an unbelievable stunt of trying to put words into my mouth again. This time you are way too obvious.
Another correction:
Wilhelm I., Friedrich III. and Wilhelm II. are Hohenzollern. So, the “Not quite unlike” is a pretty stupid comment and should be replaced by "They indeed are "
Now, i wait for IL to silently correct it and somehow claim from the above lines that i love to eat swans on toast.