L20 #3 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+7) BM3

[Amon-Sul]

@trulpen said in L20 #3 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+7) BM3:

KJF or NJF, that’s a bit like splitting hairs. I’d say it’s about the same thing. Allies invest heavily on either theatre to take it out first. Without enough income, J is taken out.

but the catch is , u may take japan out, but the euro axis can take 8 VC and u loose the game.

so its a risk ;)

[Amon-Sul]

@trulpen said in L20 #3 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+7) BM3:

KJF or NJF, that’s a bit like splitting hairs. I’d say it’s about the same thing. Allies invest heavily on either theatre to take it out first. Without enough income, J is taken out.

i am saying, just as an explanation that my goal is not to criplle and destroy japan, but just put it to some level in which it can not spread much, to have 30, 40 IPC and that i can contain it with ANZAC, China, UK Pac

So USA can smash the Nazis

[trulpen]

Yes, and I’m just saying I’d call that KJF. Destroy is very difficult. Neutralize is easier and usually the case with that strategy.