We played our third game this afternoon and although the Allies are doing a bit better (as with every A&A game, allied play is the hardest to master), we still don’t see why Japan would not attack on J1.
Really, maybe we are morons, but as far as we are concerned the whole political stuff in this game can be thrown out of the window.
Just a simple calculation:
- Japan attacks on J1, so USA gets a +40 boost to her income. (-40)
- However, you attack and take out Kwangtung J1 (minus 5 NO for UK + a swing of 3 IPC on income) (+11)
- You also attack and take Phillippines J1 (minus 5 NO for USA + a swing of 2 IPC on income) (+9)
So declaring war on turn 1 is not a 40 IPC boost for the Allies, it’s only 20 IPC. But for that 20 IPC boost, the Allies lose the following units, they otherwise would have moved to safety:
- 1 UK BB, 2 UK trns, 1 US DD, 1 US trn, 1 US ftr, 1 US bmb, 2 US inf (note: I didn’t include the infantry in Kwang, cuz they will die anyway).
A total IPC value of 77 IPC……
Plus, the 20 IPC boost for the US will produce units far far away from the front. The 77 IPC of units you kill are directly in your playgarden (tactical advantage).
So, please prove us wrong. The political rules are nice, but not when Japan will always attack J1… :wink: