@EmuGod:
No, F_alk, once again you are making conclusions based on a lack of facts. Firstly, to make such a law as to whether electricity is allowed takes more than a simple arguement of thinking. I don’t know where you read that story, but I have not heard of it in my life and I dont think any of my more religious friends have either.
“You must be joking, Mr.Feynman” by R.Feynman… it’s in there.
The reason cars are considered fire is because they combust hydrocarbons, burning them up to produce the waste products of combustion. Electricity may not be fire directly, but it may fall under one of the other 39 categories of things that are not allowed on Shabbat.
For the combustion, thanks to CC with his post.
For the other 39 categories: well maybe, but then these students lied to Feynman.
Your arguement is completely baseless and is attmepting to use what perhaps is a small section of a larger picture.
well, call it baseless. I have read it, and from all the other little bits and peices i know what is allowed and what not, then Feynman’s version of the story sounds plausible.
…
Case: Two people are cleaning a chimney and both fall down through it. One of them is clean and the other is dirty. Which one washes himself?
(a) If i was highly religious, i would say: neither
(b) As i am not, i say: the dirty one will wash himself
Reasoning/comments:
@ (a): it was the higher beings will for one to be dirty and the other not… so who am i to decide.
@ (b): this answer is so obvious, that it just shouts out to be ripped to pieces.