https://www.amazon.com/World-War-Databook-Essential-Combatants/dp/1854107666
History following a common theme?
-
STOP USING TOM CLANCEY FICTION BOOKS AS A REFERENCE!
The man is smart, no argument there. It doesn’t every thing he writes will come true. If everything he writes does come true, i am going to ask him to add a character named “Jazz” who becomes a weathly in his next book.
-
STOP USING TOM CLANCEY FICTION BOOKS AS A REFERENCE!
The man is smart, no argument there. It doesn’t every thing he writes will come true. If everything he writes does come true, i am going to ask him to add a character named “Jazz” who becomes a weathly in his next book.
I reference him as simply a person who puts an interesting spin on situations. There’s a book called “What if?” referring to historical scenarios written by historians. He writes the “What if?” from a (apparently accurate) military perspective. He also appears to research things well, and appears to fear the “call of bulls**t”. I would not take him seriously as a predictor of the future, however he seems to have an Asimov quality to his predictions - eerily possible - i think.
-
well Crypt you are right. The best fiction has some truth in it. But in all actuality i was yelling at Yanny and not you crypt :)
Yanny Said
the first thing they would do is find a way to knock out our few Pacific carriers
Hate to ask but, how does one go about knocking out a few U.S. carriers. Secondly, it would seem that “knocking” out a few U.S. carriers would provide a short term tactical advantage, but what is to stop more carriers from arriving and Subs firing missles (non nuke of course).
-
Intriguing yes, though unlikely.
-
One knocks out Pacific carriers by taking advantage of their low alert status and firing a torpedo at it’s rudder.
Tom Clancy’s books all could happen, they probably won’t, but its all realistic.
-
Yanny Said:
One knocks out Pacific carriers by taking advantage of their low alert status and firing a torpedo at it’s rudder.
So you think China will start a war with America by hitting it with a torpedo? Dont much much about politics, but I like to think that most of the world might be against them should they fire on a U.S. ship without being provoked.
-
Dont much much about politics, but I like to think that most of the world might be against them should they fire on a U.S. ship without being provoked.
The Chinese aren’t that dumb. And I seriously doubt (if war between the countries is impending), that our carriers would be on such a low alert status or that it would take only one torpedo to knock out a modern, US carrier. If the Chinese want to beat us, then it will be through their economy.
-
Just what I was thinking Moses.
Oh, and it was suppose to be “Dont know much” i never read before i post :)
-
@TG:
The Chinese aren’t that dumb. And I seriously doubt (if war between the countries is impending), that our carriers would be on such a low alert status or that it would take only one torpedo to knock out a modern, US carrier. If the Chinese want to beat us, then it will be through their economy.
You’re probably correct about the economy thing. But about the one-torpedo thing…does anyone remember the attack on the USS Cole? That was only a dingy.
-
So China wouldnt piss anyone off before it’s attacks. If there is no war impending, the Carriers wouldn’t be at Alert.
-
But about the one-torpedo thing…does anyone remember the attack on the USS Cole? That was only a dingy.
Sure, that was the inability of our ship to “shoot first and ask questions” later. (I’m not sure the level of danger at the time)
So China wouldnt piss anyone off before it’s attacks. If there is no war impending, the Carriers wouldn’t be at Alert.
Then why attack in the first place - just for the hell of it?
-
Well AFTER that you go invade some small country or something )
-
The attack on the cole was the result of a bunch of factors. Mainly Public Relations. The navy was down sized including some of the oilers, the ships that fuel ships that still run on fossle fuels for those who did not know. With fewer oilers that meant that more ships had to report to ports for fuel, Like the Cole. The Cole could not have shot that dingey if it wanted too, the guns that were manned were not loaded.
-
Yes, but there should have been armed gaurds protecting that ship at all times.
Al-Qaeda realized that we were vulnerable, and thanks to the Clinton administration’s lack of enthuisiasm for combatting terrorism, it was very much a successful hit-and-run for the bad guys.
-
Never really did like that Clinton character. Draft dodger
-
I do enjoy being in the company of those who are not fond of the former president.
-
Is ANYONE fond of the former president?
-
The uneducated people who believed that Clinton “magically” made our economy grow better. Stop acrediting everything to the president and put the blame/praise where it’s rightfully due.
-
Looks like TG Moses VI answered your question Yanny my man.
-
LOL.
I’m glad to see that I’m not the only one who hates Clinton. I’ve been hearing way too many people praising Clinton for his character (…??) and his ability to “relate” to people. Gimme’ a break!
I’m still trying to get over the fact that a lot of foolish American’s voted the man into a second term… :o
Suggested Topics
