GARGANTUA'S $200 TOURNAMENT OF EXTRA DEATH AND PAIN (TripleA Only) 2xELIMINATION

  • '13

    I’m still in, everyone else seems to have dropped or disappeared.

    Since the next round isn’t populated there’s no reason to call our game yet.

    V


  • Last Stand Match

    **Creature Commandos (Make_it_Round + Gazza )

    vs

    Team Third Floor (GTBroman + baronfel + PhoenixGT)**

    Can be found here:

    http://www.axisandallies.org/forums/index.php?topic=28489.0

  • TripleA

    unfortunately the little threats have dropped out of the tournament.

    @Little_Boot:

    @Vold:

    @allweneedislove:

    Hello Gentlemen,

    I noticed that you have started the thread for your 2nd round game.
    http://www.axisandallies.org/forums/index.php?topic=28074.0

    but have not actually started or responded in over a month.
    Is everyone still interested and enjoying the tournament?
    Does everyone plan on continuing?

    Kind regards,
    allweneedislove

    I’m in.  But Bunnies has been MIA for a few months, and LB hasn’t been on for a few weeks.  Minor Threat dropped out.

    So if LB and I don’t hook up and do our game by the time the bracket ahead of us is populated, then LB will default and I’ll play the next bracket.

    But that’s around away so LB has time.

    V

    You can proceed to the next round, I shall forfeit the game. The problem is I’m far to busy right now with real life to participate in the tournament. Good luck, Vold.

    to win this tournament you will not have to actually win games, just hang around longer than everyone else.

  • '13

    at least that is something I do well

  • TripleA

    garg, vold, and clausiwitz’s idiot apprentices

    due to Transatlantic Alliance Of Evil and little threats dropping from the tournament, both teams of speedo hares(vold) and clausiwitz’s idiot apprentices(cia) opponents’ have dropped from the tournament in the 2nd round.

    instead of having both vold and cia sit around for 2 months, why not pair them up. then pair up the 2 dissolved teams.
    so instead of two teams having a buy in the 2nd round, this would cause 1 team to get a buy in the 3rd round.

    what do all parties think about this suggestion?

  • '13

    I’m OK either way.

  • Liaison TripleA '11 '10

    thats a good idea - please do so Love!

    Thanks for your help. :)

    Love is now an official tournament moderator! Do what he says! :0

  • TripleA

    eskander, i do not plan on taking your official bracketeer position. but i did update the bracket to show the new matchups to accommodate the dropped teams.

    OFFICIAL UNTIL PROVEN WRONG XDAP Tournament Bracketing 2012-1-1.xls

  • '13

    I’m confused on this bracket.  It has Speedo Hares vs Clausewitz’s IA’s in Loser bracket R1, and the winner faces Clausewitz’s IA’s?

    V

  • Liaison TripleA '11 '10

    SILENCE PUNY ONE!

    Whilst I officially review this matter.

  • Liaison TripleA '11 '10

    What it says vold is that you lost to clausewitz already?

    is that true?

    And if not… when are you playing? :P  And if you have been defeated twice… have you secured membership in one of the dissolved slots? or on a broken team? :D

  • TripleA

    @Vold:

    I’m confused on this bracket.  It has Speedo Hares vs Clausewitz’s IA’s in Loser bracket R1, and the winner faces Clausewitz’s IA’s?

    V

    it was my fault, i tried to take on eskander’s role of braketeer and messed it up. lets try this file instead.

    OFFICIAL UNTIL PROVEN WRONG XDAP Tournament Bracketing 2012-1-2.xls


  • The Numenoreons won our game over Team Mountain High.

  • Liaison TripleA '11 '10

    FYI

    All Round 3 X-Dap games that have not already started, will NOT recieve a bid…

    instead, they will recieve a Russian Bomber!  For playtesting purposes…. ;)

  • '12

    @Gargantua:

    FYI

    All Round 3 X-Dap games that have not already started, will NOT recieve a bid…

    instead, they will recieve a Russian Bomber!  For playtesting purposes…. ;)

    so if sides cannot be agreed upon, there will be a coin flip but no additional bid?

  • '12

    @Boldfresh:

    @Gargantua:

    FYI

    All Round 3 X-Dap games that have not already started, will NOT recieve a bid…

    instead, they will recieve a Russian Bomber!  For playtesting purposes…. ;)

    so if sides cannot be agreed upon, there will be a coin flip but no additional bid?

    or are you saying the russians get a bomber in their starting package and THEN bidding occurs.  this would probably turn into bidding positive for the axis or negative for the allies right?

  • TripleA

    @Gargantua:

    FYI

    All Round 3 X-Dap games that have not already started, will NOT recieve a bid…

    instead, they will recieve a Russian Bomber!  For playtesting purposes…. ;)

    garg, i would just let people play and bid as they like.

    i dont mind using a russian bomber as a bid suggestion. but would not force it on anyone.

    i would be happy to be the axis and give my allied opponent a russian bomber in my next game.


  • I think the objective is to test the idea that some have been promoting, that the addition of a Russian bomber balances the game and obviates the need for a bid.  People playing in the 3rd round of a tournament like this will all be solid players and it gives a good venue to objectively test out the idea.

  • TripleA

    @Vance:

    I think the objective is to test the idea that some have been promoting, that the addition of a Russian bomber balances the game and obviates the need for a bid.  People playing in the 3rd round of a tournament like this will all be solid players and it gives a good venue to objectively test out the idea.

    i understand the idea and think it is a good one, but should be a suggestion and not mandated.

    when people signed up for the tournament this is not something they have been expecting to change 6 months into a tournament.

  • '12

    @allweneedislove:

    @Vance:

    I think the objective is to test the idea that some have been promoting, that the addition of a Russian bomber balances the game and obviates the need for a bid.  People playing in the 3rd round of a tournament like this will all be solid players and it gives a good venue to objectively test out the idea.

    i understand the idea and think it is a good one, but should be a suggestion and not mandated.

    when people signed up for the tournament this is not something they have been expecting to change 6 months into a tournament.

    garg clearly stated that he could change anything at anytime, or something to that effect no?  :-)

    i think forcing the russians to have a bomber is fine, but then we could still bid so that’s all i was asking.

Suggested Topics

  • 25
  • 79
  • 24
  • 17
  • 5
  • 1
  • 5
  • 114
Axis & Allies Boardgaming Custom Painted Miniatures

207

Online

17.5k

Users

40.0k

Topics

1.7m

Posts