b921aa6e-aae3-4654-993b-885e40bdffe6-image.png @VictoryFirst
For reference, here is where we are in the current combat: (First round of combat was 1 hit a side. I tipped the BB for Germany since it was obvious).
sz96 holds with CA, bmb retreat
NCM per map
Place units: dd sz95
Collect : 11 + 2 saved = 13 IPC
Italy needs to roll convoy for SZ97
Italy convoy sz97
Rolls: 3@3; Total Hits: 03@3: (4, 6, 6)
Germany 2
Buy:
dd (8 )
2fgt (20)
9 inf (27)
4art (16)
CM
sz96 (CA)
fgt SIta
tac WGer
sz97 (CA, AC, fgt)
2fgt, 2tac WGer
sz81 (tr, 2dd)
2bmb Wger
sz109 (CA, damaged BB) NEED SCRAMBLING ORDERS
2ss, CA, BB, fgt, tac, AC sz112
fgt, tac Wger
Eir (mec)
inf Nor, 2inf Wger > 2tr sz112 > sz110 pick up art Wfr > sz109
Sfr (art)
inf Wfr
art, tnk Fra
Gre (4inf)
5inf Bul
3tnk Yugo
NEED SCRAMBLING ORDERS FOR SZ109
No scramble.
Without abnormal dice (granted, we’ve seen that :lol:), it seems like the strafe opening dooms the entire British fleet without significantly risking any planes or capitol ships.
If Britain scrambles in SZ110 G1 and does not over-perform, Germany will have an easy Sea Lion.
If Britain doesn’t scramble in SZ110 G1, it still can’t defend the survivors in SZ111, mostly likely can’t retaliate when they are sunk, and also suffer convoy damage.
Eitherway, Britain can’t defend itself against a G3 or G4 Sea Lion (unless perhaps it gives up Taranto, which I strongly considered)
Not that the Axis really need to Sea Lion when the UK has no Atlantic navy.
I believe in this version, allowing Sealion is not such a big deal. When russia is played properly, they become so big that they can defend themselves so well and for so long that it gives better winning chances for the allies than an all out Barbarossa.
SeaLion is now only interesting when UK underdefend UK, or get horribly diced in the opening round, IMO
sz96
Rolls: 1@3 1@4; Total Hits: 21@3: (3)1@4: (1)
Rolls: 1@3; Total Hits: 11@3: (3)
sz96 cwlo fgt
sz97
Rolls: 2@3 2@4; Total Hits: 32@3: (4, 2)2@4: (4, 1)
OOL for sz97 ?
AC + fighter
sz97 def
Rolls: 1@2 1@3 1@4; Total Hits: 11@2: (4)1@3: (4)1@4: (3)
sz97 rd2
Rolls: 2@3 1@4; Total Hits: 32@3: (2, 3)1@4: (4)
Rolls: 1@3; Total Hits: 11@3: (1)
sz97 cwlo fgt, tac
sz81
Rolls: 2@4; Total Hits: 22@4: (1, 2)
Rolls: 2@2; Total Hits: 12@2: (1, 3)
sz81 cwlo bmb
sz109
Rolls: 2@2; Total Hits: 02@2: (3, 5)
No hit for subs
sz109
Rolls: 3@3 3@4; Total Hits: 43@3: (2, 4, 1)3@4: (1, 5, 2)
Rolls: 1@3 1@4; Total Hits: 11@3: (4)1@4: (4)
Do you think Taranto should be universal then (as a lot of the forum advocates)? �I really struggle with Allied strategy.
sz109 cwol, BB damaged
Eir
Rolls: 2@1 2@2; Total Hits: 12@1: (2, 5)2@2: (2, 4)
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 01@2: (3)