@leemorrison
Looking forward to it. Cheers! GG
Cereal vs Booger-10
-
I think there has been some mix up you have two battleships that attack at 4 and 2 planes that should only attack at 3? where are 4@4 coming from?
-
never mind that was my def. sorry
-
z91 taken with
2 Dmg Battleship, 1 Carrier, 1 fig and 3 transports remaining
fighter lands on carrier again.Gib twol
Non Combat moves done, so
Placement:
3 Destroyers in z10
3 Tanks in Eus
4 inf in Eus
3 Transports in z101US Collects:
72 IPCmap and onto China
-
China:
IPC: 10Buys:
3 Inf = 1
saves 1 IPCPlacement:
3 inf in KwaCollects:
2 IPC + 1 saved
Total: 3 IPCon to UK
-
UK:
London:
IPC: 24
Buys:
2 Fighters = 4
saves 4 IPCCalcutta:
IPC: 13
Buys:
3 Arty = 12
saves 1 IPCCombat Moves:
Hun (1 arty)
3 tank, 1 arty, 9 inf from YunSze (2 tank)
10 inf from Yunkwe (1 tank)
2 inf from Yun
1 fig and 1 tac from MalBattle for Hun:
att
Rolls: 8@1 2@2 3@3; Total Hits: 38@1: (6, 5, 3, 2, 4, 6, 4, 6)2@2: (2, 3)3@3: (2, 2, 4)def:
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 11@2: (2) -
Hun twlo 1 inf
Battle for Kwe
att:
Rolls: 2@1 1@3 1@4; Total Hits: 12@1: (1, 5)1@3: (5)1@4: (5)Def:
Rolls: 1@3; Total Hits: 11@3: (2) -
Kwe twlo 1 inf
Battle for Sze:
att:
Rolls: 10@1; Total Hits: 110@1: (6, 4, 5, 5, 5, 6, 4, 5, 1, 5)def:
Rolls: 2@3; Total Hits: 12@3: (2, 4) -
round 2
att
Rolls: 9@1; Total Hits: 19@1: (3, 3, 1, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 4)def
Rolls: 1@3; Total Hits: 11@3: (3) -
Sze twlo 2 inf
Non combat Moves:
2 inf from Bur to Yun
1 inf from Fic to Kwa
2 inf from Mal to Shn
1 sub from z109 to z91
1 sub from z105 to z91
1 fig from London to Gib
1 fig and 1 tac from Kwe to Yun
1 inf from Ken to Tang
1 tank from Con to Tang
1 tank from Rho to TangMap and onto Anzac:
-
Anzac:
IPC: 21
Buys:
1 Transport = 14
1 arty = 10
1 Fighter = 0Combat moves:
1 transport from z54 (with 2 inf from Que) to z35 and unload in Phi (walkin)Non Combat Moves:
1 destroyer from z54 to z21
1 carrier with 2 fig from z62 to z45
1 sub from z54 to z45Placement:
1 transport in z62
1 fig, 1 arty in NswCollects:
10 + 10 NO
Total: 20 IPCMap, Onto Italy
The French Fighter in London flies to Gib in the non combat fase, thats all france does, so you can go from italy to Germany again.
-
-
It6 (37)
2 trans = 14 = 23
1 tnk = 6 = 17
4inf = 12 = 5
1 art = 4 = 1
SAVE1CM
Z91
2 dd from z95
2 fgt from Sfr
Scramble 2 fighters from Gib?EPR(twol)
Tran from z71 with inf and tnk from Saf to z80 unloadWIND (twol)
1 trans from z71 1 inf, 1art from saf to z79 unload
2 trans -
I am going to assume yes on the scramble since you will kill everything
att
Rolls: 2@2 2@3; Total Hits: 02@2: (4, 6)2@3: (6, 4)
def
Rolls: 2@1 2@2 3@4; Total Hits: 32@1: (5, 6)2@2: (3, 6)3@4: (1, 4, 1) -
I missed two more at 4 for you
Rolls: 2@4; Total Hits: 12@4: (5, 2) -
Well dont roll for combat ;)
Your destroyers cant attack as i hold Gib and therefore you cant go to z91 and thats prob not a bad thing when i look at the rolls. -
you are right,
I am still thinking we should just start over from round 2 with UK.My plan was to move everything from middle east into india, I should have been able to attack with italy on round 7 then german in round with limited counter attack. Not sure how long I would have been able to hold it but then you take over middle east and I reinforce africa with italy and 2 trans. We would continue to slug it out in europe with you gaining in IPCs while I just hold on. You would eventually win but I think I make flanking moves in Pacific such as taking Haw and threatening Aust. I would also plan on taking kwa with tanks and planes this round to limit usa involvement in pacific at least for ground forces. Good game I learned a lot.
Do you need me to send you the map for UK2?
-
Nope, ill just take of from UK 2 and we will start over.
Good game, and im getting the hang of this now.
Well lets see in the alternate reality how things plays out without the loss of 9 Transports.We agree i start on UK 2 from the start and i will not buy Carrier and attack transports right?
-
yes UK round 2 you start with your purchases.
-
do you want to start a different post?
-
Nah, not unless your want to? im fine with this one.
Suggested Topics
