Great work! Thanks
Global Map View
-
You know what I mean, mainland US. I think 3 is good, with 4 for Canada. Any more and it is just silliness and pride.
Ok call me silly.
Now where do you see the four?
Well two are already in the Pacific.
Everything from the Grand Banks to the prairies would have to be one territory with a single IPC value, I guess a major IC and both an airbase (BCATP) and naval base (Halifax).
Then NWT can sit on top of it.
Or were you going to split Canada vertically so Chicago is one move from the coast abutting Greenland?
Just curious…#542
Greenland is inaccessible by land.
-
You know what I mean, mainland US. I think 3 is good, with 4 for Canada. Any more and it is just silliness and pride.
Ok call me silly.
Now where do you see the four?
Well two are already in the Pacific.
Everything from the Grand Banks to the prairies would have to be one territory with a single IPC value, I guess a major IC and both an airbase (BCATP) and naval base (Halifax).
Then NWT can sit on top of it.
Or were you going to split Canada vertically so Chicago is one move from the coast abutting Greenland?
Just curious…#542
Greenland is inaccessible by land.
well by coast I meant there was a sea zone between them. Perhaps “neighboring” Greenland would’ve been a better choice of words…. I trust you get what I’m trying to say. Dividing Canada up into longtitudinal strips brings Greenland too close to the US IPC machine.
-
Anyway, for the life of me I can’t see why LH stated that every province would be represented.
I agree 7 is a bit of a stretch… sure Canada’s huge but really I could get behind 5.
Two we’ve got in the Pacific.
On the Europe side we get a Central Canada for the prairies and Ontario. Put some industry and an air base in there.
Then Atlantic Canada for everything east of the Ottawa valley including Halifax and those charming Newfies.
Then top the whole thing off with the NWT. Long way from Baffin Island to Niagara Falls after all. Need to throw some zero IPC space in there.Just my two cents.
#546
-
You know what I mean, mainland US. I think 3 is good, with 4 for Canada. Any more and it is just silliness and pride.
Well… Quebec wanting to secede is just silliness and pride too… if I do say so myself.
Let them, and then Canada and US can invade and kick all them french Canadians back to France.
-
@Brain:
You know what I mean, mainland US. I think 3 is good, with 4 for Canada. Any more and it is just silliness and pride.
Well… Quebec wanting to secede is just silliness and pride too… if I do say so myself.
Let them, and then Canada and US can invade and kick all them french Canadians back to France.
We don’t want them. We’ll nuke all of them if you even dare.
-
@UN:
@Brain:
You know what I mean, mainland US. I think 3 is good, with 4 for Canada. Any more and it is just silliness and pride.
Well… Quebec wanting to secede is just silliness and pride too… if I do say so myself.
Let them, and then Canada and US can invade and kick all them french Canadians back to France.
We don’t want them. We’ll nuke all of them if you even dare.
Man you guys are funny. I love this!
Let’s try to keep the land in Quebec nice though. I have been there and it is quite beautiful. Maybe I will move up there and live after all the French patriots are gone.
-
Well from the map it does look like 5 tt on the Europe map, I’m guessing that the reason he is doing this is so Germany can’t get to US from Canada in two turns. Man 7 tt for Canada, that is crazy……
-
Well from the map it does look like 5 tt on the Europe map, I’m guessing that the reason he is doing this is so Germany can’t get to US from Canada in two turns. Man 7 tt for Canada, that is crazy……
OK from what you can see of that blurry map, perhaps the additional territories are for limiting bomber runs from Greenland / Iceland to the US?
#550
-
Well from the map it does look like 5 tt on the Europe map, I’m guessing that the reason he is doing this is so Germany can’t get to US from Canada in two turns. Man 7 tt for Canada, that is crazy……
OK from what you can see of that blurry map, perhaps the additional territories are for limiting bomber runs from Greenland / Iceland to the US?
#550
If it’s like that make it your desktop, I got that idea from Wild Bill, it really works.
-
I made the global pic my desk top pic last week so I can stare at it and dream about Aug 24th. It may be fuzzy but I just look at it in whole and not so much the details until a better pic gets released.
-
yeah, who cares if US doesn’t match, it didn’t in AA50 and no one complains about that game. The game is not meant to be played with US match rather India matching. When we see more pics soon and get the product itself I’m sure everything will be nice. :-)
-
yeah, who cares if US doesn’t match, it didn’t in AA50 and no one complains about that game
In AA50, USA matched
-
yeah, who cares if US doesn’t match, it didn’t in AA50 and no one complains about that game
In AA50, USA matched
Uh…you must be blind… I just checked… they don’t.
-
It doesn’t really matter to me if the US is a match because I would not think of playing a game like that, however it would be cool to see it from that view.