Thank you. Had not seen that and was unhappy to contradict Kriegkund, but could not see any difference with what I had said. Now I realise without a japanese DOW against UK/Anzac a Japanese player could have moved through an occupied sea hex on its way to a Dutch territory. Now it cannot. Though, of course, my way and knowing I was provoking war with UK/Anzac, I would have attacked them too and, therefore, not moved illegally through a sea zone . You have to love Japan.
Scrambling Question
-
The US is amphibious assaulting Korea and can the planes in japan scramble to kill the transports in the seazone. The are no jap ships in the sea zone.
-
Yes. As long as the airbase is on an island (or Japan or Austrailia) you can defend any naval attack into the adjacent sea zone.
-
Yes. As long as the airbase is on an island (or Japan or Austrailia) you can defend any naval attack into the adjacent sea zone.
Not Australia
-
Yes. As long as the airbase is on an island (or Japan or Austrailia) you can defend any naval attack into the adjacent sea zone.
Not Australia
Australia is a continent and does not fit the game definition of an island (a single land territory surrounded by sea territories).
-
You are correct. My appologies.