Capturing or liberating a friendly territory

@Soviet-Steamroller said in Captured Industrial complex in China?:

So long story short it is better never to make any assumption when going back and forth from 1940 to Anniversary right?
If it is not clearly written down then don’t assume it!

Sounds good. However, there are many parallels in the rulesets. But not in this specific case - neither in other cases.
Better check the rulebooks/FAQ, as “assuming” or “believing” is sometimes misleading indeed. :wink:

In case of doubts just ask of course! :slightly_smiling_face:

Thank you for the reply.  We have always been playing this way, so it was nice to confirm that it was the right way to handle withdrawals.

Wow, demo, something like that is usually pretty much a game-ender, that’s for sure.

What devastation!  Thanks for sharing.

@Funcioneta:

A good question is why Manchuria and Kiangsu have a japanese marker. It would be easier having only a Chinese marker, I cannot convince my friends to put the jap control marker on them  :-P. That jap marker printed on map only serves to one purpose: confuse

You are correct,

Three.

Yes.  I didn’t state it correctly there.  The point is stacking up warships with the intent of Bombardment can be negated pretty easily with this rule.

okay, must have misunderstood jen’s post then.  I think that perhaps my initial comment “1 aa gun at any given IC pr turn” perhaps caused my confusion i light of jen’s comments.

but thanks for clearing it up  :)

I’d say we should ignore that rule from the very first day. It’s a source of bugs