i dunno, i think i’d prefer it under normal rules w/ IC’s. the rule w/ if you roll two 6’s and you get to destroy the IC sounded cool, but the rule you just talked about sounded too complicated. i dunno, maybe it would be really fun, i think you’d just have to play it to find out
Your right about it being complicated, it kind of ruins the joy of the simplicity of the battle. I’m just over-thinking out load.
Have you been playing WinwarII? :o
what is that? i’ve never heard of it
i think it would be a nice little advantage for the axis, sice it would be much eaiser for japan to bomb a indian IC than for britain to bomb a manchurian IC. (i dunno, i just usually leave the english bomber in the europe theater) and it wouldn’t really apply much in europe or in africa, unless britain builds an IC in south africa and germany is willing to bomb that out
many US and UK bombers have made it to Moscow in games past . . . .
yeah, i guess you’re right. i usually just leave my US and UK bombers in engalnd though, maybe moscow is a better move b/c you can still SBR germany, and you can also SBR a japanese IC on the mainland (if they build one)
I prefer Moscow for allied bombers since they can still hit Germany and threaten the Medd. as well as support Asian activities.
i’m so stupid, i had never thought about that. i just have always put them in england
lol, same here! I feel dumb, cause that’s obviously better.
I agree the simple version is better. I’ll try to talk my buds into trying it.
Yup, HBMRs outa Russia (RUS) is one of my favorite moves. The problem is that you need to leave 1 INF there and maybe 1 ARM to cover it.
The possiblity of BMRs in RUS is why I build an IC for Japan in KWA if I do at all(about 1/3 of the time.)
A funny story: The first guy who tried that on me had moved 2 UK BMRs and 1 US BMR to Russia without protection by the end of UK2. On G2 I flew 1 BMR and 2 FTR to Russia, lost 1 FTR on the way in, and destroyed his BMR wings!!! Glory! Glory! Glory!
