Scramble scotland
11L 41 Tyzoq (Axis) v Boldfresh (Allies+3) +Tech Game 1
-
Usa tech, has 2
Rolls: 2@6; Total Hits: 22@6: (2, 1)
-
Usa’ s tech drought and germanys tech-per-turn surge have really put the damper on allied hopes :|
-
USA 52 - with 54 buys 18 inf
CM
kar (inf) v inf (fin), bom (wca)
combat:
kar - inf, hb vs. inf
Rolls: 1@1 2@4; Total Hits: 11@1: (2)2@4: (5, 1)
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 01@2: (5) -
kar twol
NC
fin - bom (kar)
wca - 3 inf, 3 bom (wus), 6 inf (eca), 72 ftr (sol)
eca - 14 inf (eus)
z10 - trn, 26 acc, 6 des, 5 bat (z20)
z56 - 40 sub (z46)place 14 inf (eus)
place 4 inf (wus)collect 50 + war bonds @:
war bonds:
Rolls: 1@6; Total Hits: 11@6: (4) -
has 54 and 2 researchers
that extra 80 per turn you’re making is really starting to take a toll… :-(
-
the longer this game goes the more that difference will add up… :-)
-
**Germany 53
Purchase ($117)**
4 Researchers ($20)Research
Rolling 4d6:
(2, 3, 4, 5) -
**Germany 53
Purchase ($117)**
4 Researchers ($20), 6 Ftr ($80), $37 SavedResearch
FailedCombat
#1) UK (rockets)
w/ 1 AA Pol#2) Norway (rockets)
w/ 1 AA Bel#3) Leningrad
65 Inf, 2 Art, 27 Arm vs 1 Inf
w/ 23 Inf, 2 Art Bst
w/ 40 Inf, 27 Arm Bel -
UK (rockets)
Rolling 1d6:
(2)
Norway (rockets)
Rolling 1d6:
(2)
Leningrad
DEF:
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 11@2: (1) -
Shouldn’t you roll the attack? (u never know) :lol:
-
**Germany 53
Purchase ($117)**
4 Researchers ($20), 6 Ftr ($80), $37 SavedResearch
FailedCombat
#1) UK (rockets)
w/ 1 AA Pol
3 + 2 = 5 Damage#2) Norway (rockets)
w/ 1 AA Bel
3 + 2 = 5 Damage#3) Leningrad
65 Inf, 2 Art, 27 Arm vs 1 Inf
w/ 23 Inf, 2 Art Bst
w/ 40 Inf, 27 Arm Bel
Taken with loss of 1 InfNoncombat Moves
7 Inf, 9 Ftr, 7 Bmr Ger > Fra
8 Inf Pol > Ger
5 Inf Bst > Pol
7 Arm Epl > Bst
Fleet sz6 > sz51Mobilize
6 Ftr - GerCollect
$42 + $15 NOs + $37 Saved = $94 + WBWar Bonds
Rolling 1d6:
(2) -
Shouldn’t you roll the attack? (u never know) :lol:
If your curious how many hits I get I’ll let you roll it :-P :lol:
Collect
$94 + $2 = $96 -
**Japan
Research**
Rolling 2d6:
(5, 6) -
Japan hits again!
Chart 2
Rolling 1d6:
(3) -
Shouldn’t you roll the attack? (u never know) :lol:
Instead of actually rolling an attack I decided to do some calculating: Assuming 1 roll every 15 seconds (the amount of time required between posts) you should expect to see a miss with that attack once every 20,000,000 years.
-
**Japan
Research**
Improved ShipyardsPurchase ($84)
5 Ftr ($50), 3 AC ($83), $1 SavedCombat
#1) Caroline Islands
3 Inf, 3 Arm, 24 Ftr vs 2 Inf
w/ 3 Inf, 3 Arm sz51 via 3 Trn sz51
w/ 24 Ftr sz51 -
Caroline Islands
ATK: 3 Inf, 3 Arm, 24 Ftr
Rolls: 3@1 27@3; Total Hits: 173@1: (5, 4, 5)27@3: (1, 3, 4, 4, 2, 6, 1, 5, 3, 3, 2, 5, 3, 3, 4, 3, 3, 1, 2, 2, 6, 2, 5, 3, 5, 4, 2)DEF: 2 Inf
Rolls: 2@2; Total Hits: 12@2: (3, 2) -
**Japan
Research**
Improved ShipyardsPurchase ($84)
5 Ftr ($50), 3 AC ($83), $1 SavedCombat
#1) Caroline Islands
3 Inf, 3 Arm, 24 Ftr vs 2 Inf
w/ 3 Inf, 3 Arm sz51 via 3 Trn sz51
w/ 24 Ftr sz51
Taken with loss of 1 InfNoncombat Moves
1 AA sz51 > Car
24 Ftr Car > sz51
Fleet (-2 Ftr) sz62 > sz51
2 Ftr sz62 > sz35
1 Ftr Jap > sz51
5 Inf Lib > Alg
8 Alg Egy > Alg
3 Inf Egy > Lib
2 Inf Trj > Egy
5 Arm Sud > Agy
4 Arm Ind > Trj
2 Inf, 1 AA Arc > Kar
2 Inf Bel > Kar
1 Inf, 1 AA Mos > Arc
1 AA Cau > UkrMobilize
5 Ftr - Jap
3 AC - sz35Collect
$64 + $15 + $1 Saved = $80 -
UK53 - with 30 buys 2 repair to nwy, 7 inf, save 7
CM
rockets:
to ita from gbr
to ger from nwynwe () - inf, bom (gbr)
iwo (2 inf) v 2 inf, 4 bom (wca)combat:
rkts:
ger
Rolls: 1@6; Total Hits: 11@6: (6)ita
Rolls: 1@6; Total Hits: 11@6: (3)iwo - 2 inf, 4 bom vs. 2 inf
Rolls: 2@1 2@4 2@4 2@4 2@4; Total Hits: 52@1: (6, 2)2@4: (4, 6)2@4: (5, 5)2@4: (4, 2)2@4: (1, 2)
Rolls: 2@2; Total Hits: 02@2: (5, 6) -
iwo twol
6 damage to ger
3 damage to itaNC
wus - 4 bom (iwo), 2 bom (nze), 8 inf (wca)
z55 - sub (z56)
nwy - all troops and AA from fin
gbr - bom (nwe)
z12 - all z10 fleet, 8 ftr (gbr)place 5 inf (gbr)
place 2 inf (nwy)collect 27 + 7 saved + war bonds @:
war bonds:
Rolls: 1@6; Total Hits: 11@6: (4)