Infantry production w/o IC…


  • Has anyone ever played A&A where each country can produce infantry in any territory (limited to IPC value) without the having an IC? – i.e. GER can produce 1 infantry unit per turn in ALG. Territories without IPC values (i.e. Gibraltar) and neutral territories (if violated) have an IPC value of 1.


  • No, but I see it giving the Allies a better chance to defend against Japan-UK could have 5 inf and an ftr before Japan’s first turn. It would certainly make for a different Asian war.

    If you build an IC in India say, can you build 3 inf and 3 armor?


  • how about only “developed countries”? like UK: Britian, South Africa, East and West Canada, India, Australia and New Zealand. Germany: All. Russia: Caucusus, Keraila SSR, Russia, Evenki Nat’l Okrug, and Yakut. Japan: Japan, Manchuria, Kwantung, and Okinawa. USA: East and West USA, hawaii, and Alaska. eh……


  • @Grigoriy:

    If you build an IC in India say, can you build 3 inf and 3 armor?

    No – the maximum units produced (whether by an IC or just regular infantry) is still equal to the IPC value of the territory … or unlimited in those “initial” IC’s.

    @Guerrilla:

    how about only “developed countries”? like UK: Britian, South Africa, East and West Canada, India, Australia and New Zealand. Germany: All. Russia: Caucusus, Keraila SSR, Russia, Evenki Nat’l Okrug, and Yakut. Japan: Japan, Manchuria, Kwantung, and Okinawa. USA: East and West USA, hawaii, and Alaska. eh……

    Perhaps it would be better to have only territories with 2 or highter IPC values able to produce infantry and make the maximum number of units produced equal to the IPC value minus 1 (i.e. India could produce 2 infantry units, but Italian East Africa could not produce any)?


  • @MistaBiggs:

    @Guerrilla:

    how about only “developed countries”? like UK: Britian, South Africa, East and West Canada, India, Australia and New Zealand. Germany: All. Russia: Caucusus, Keraila SSR, Russia, Evenki Nat’l Okrug, and Yakut. Japan: Japan, Manchuria, Kwantung, and Okinawa. USA: East and West USA, hawaii, and Alaska. eh……

    Perhaps it would be better to have only territories with 2 or highter IPC values able to produce infantry and make the maximum number of units produced equal to the IPC value minus 1 (i.e. India could produce 2 infantry units, but Italian East Africa could not produce any)?

    yeah that would answer it…(the problem that is)


  • or how about allegiance???


  • Not sure what u mean – please elaborate…


  • @MistaBiggs:

    Not sure what u mean – please elaborate…

    any terr. has a certain amount of Population loyal to the government it started the game under, and that is the limit to non-IC inf production……

1 / 1

Suggested Topics

  • [AA50 & AA42.2] Redeploy non-capital starting ICs

    Dec 5, 2017, 7:26 PM
    1
  • What would you do if the game started with ANZAC/France??

    Sep 7, 2015, 11:56 AM
    6
  • Territory Income Bonus: for Classic, Revised, 1941/42.2 etc

    Jul 21, 2016, 9:27 AM
    43
  • Quick fix for Russia/Japan Non Agression

    Oct 3, 2012, 5:34 PM
    5
  • Historical Accuracy: British Bombers and Ukranie IC in Alpha2+

    Apr 4, 2011, 8:57 PM
    5
  • Entrenched Positions For Infantry and Artillery

    Dec 15, 2010, 12:49 AM
    8
  • AA-guns or built-in AA-ability for IC?

    Jun 11, 2006, 10:28 AM
    7
  • Blind A/A

    Jun 24, 2003, 10:11 PM
    2
Axis & Allies Boardgaming Custom Painted Miniatures

34

Online

17.6k

Users

40.2k

Topics

1.7m

Posts