Topics created by Mino1124

With some simple house rules attacking the true neutrals does not need to be insane.

In our group we are remove 1 inf in each of the mongolian territories and in angola and mozambique. This makes attacking an European true neutral less devastating for the asian land war and makes it less severe for the Italians. Its also more true to history which is a bonus.

We are also thinking of making Argentina as a pro-axis minor. This would be partly to make south america a possible theatre of operations and also to reduce the extreme impact on the american economy and manpower from attacking a true neutral. Not very true to history but we just regard that as a potential bonus.

k

Either economy can pay for research, and both benefit from the results.  War Bonds IPCs may be split between the economies in any way the player likes.

…i know

I expect WOTC will post the manual a few months after release, if we’re lucky.

From my understanding the Europe map will be the exact same size as the Pacific map, so just double the width and the height should be the same.

@Call77 said in Event cards:

@crusaderiv hi could i also get these event cards? please

He hasn’t been on site for almost 2 years now. I have his cards. PM me your E Mail and I’ll send you the file.
Last time we talked he said he was moving and nothing since then.

@Captain:

play a few more games.  Japan should take Phillipenes right away on J1 and the US should not be able to fortify it.

If they do that though they also need to take the uk space along the china coast to prevent both us and uk from their NOs.

@Autarch:

And AP is a transport.

which is just too much of a leap for my brain… it sticks at “Armour Piercing” or “Anti-personnel” and looks for context on dry land

@MaherC:

pretty sure by “occupy” to get the 5 IPC one time deal you have to have boots on the ground, not planes in the sky.

That was my thought. Time to post a question… :evil:

@moompix:

The destroyers are the ones with the squared end.

The Cruisers have two pointed ends.

Accidentally sent this in a personal message, but anyway when I got the 1942 edition, I thought that’s how it was orignally. Somebody on BGG said otherwise so I’ve been using them backwards. Thanks.

@Gargantua:

I have to give Krieghund an AMEN here.  He is one of the ONLY people involved in the game creation, who is reaching out to fans, to try and help them out, and support a product that was at some point improperly managed and sent to consumers.  Atleast HE is standing by HIS contribution to the product.

Thanks, but I’m just the “point man”.  Larry and WotC are behind this errata effort 100%, otherwise I wouldn’t be allowed to do it.

Maybe that should be added to the errata?