STOP and THINK!
The USA developed the atomic bomb first. If nessessary, I’m sure that they would have built more than 2 or 3, and used 'em without hesitation like they did on Japan. As long as US was not taken, there scientists would have made things work eventually, even if Britain was taken.
go for the soutern half of asia and you’ll get rich and be able to attack almost every USSR country from china, middle east area.
@Grigoriy:
@mat:
Why attack Italy? :lol: I would start doing consecutive landings on France as soon as I had enough transports and men.
Possibility of Germany fortifying France and having Italy as a more feasible option; variety in gameplay. :)
So what if they fortify it? That just means more germans that the US and UK can easily kill off, and less men against the russians.
Why attack Italy? :lol: I would start doing consecutive landings on France as soon as I had enough transports and men.
If the island has a name, it’s a single territory.
@Grigoriy:
In all the games of A&AE I’ve played, Germany went for the convoys. In these forums, it seems everyone takes out the British fleet first.
Hey man! Do both!
great idea!!
(hmmm… wonder where the nearest psychiatric ward is) :lol:
UK: God Save the Queen/King or Rule Britainnia
do you play them (ie: piano guitar etc) or do you play a cd, mp3, tape, etc?
oh yeah,
about your big debate on the middle east: I usually drop off a couple of tanks or some inf+art to stop the british from getting control of africa
Has anyone tried placing 3 art. in belorussia
i find that thats a pretty good move b/c germany is going to overwhelm everything on your front lines then the artillery can be used for counterattacks