yeaah but germany never was big on boats. THey didnt have a large navy
@Brain:
There was no need for a navy in the Atlantic for the US, Germany didn’t have much of a navy to defeat.
Wolf packs of subs. Ask Churchill in 1940-41
US didn’t get started over there until late 1942.
Per LH 02/04/10
. "Will US have a spilt income in the global game- 50IPC for Pacific theater and 50IPC for the Europe theater- or will they be able to combine their income and dominate one theater??? The US will NOT have a split income in the global game. However, one of the powers will indeed have a split income but not the US.
Finally, this thread can be closed. Wise Larry has spoken
You can bet the splitted country will be UK: England plus Canada, probably with a minor IC at Ottawa :wink:
I’d like also some canadian markers to keep the tray of the brave men of the north :lol:
You can bet the splitted country will be UK: England plus Canada, probably with a minor IC at Ottawa :wink:
I’d like also some canadian markers to keep the tray of the brave men of the north :lol:
Well I’d guess UK as well. Keeping their Pacific income from Europe.
Now let’s hope they keep the US Neutrality rules as realistic as their economic flexibility…. although I doubt it.
LOL. The split income power will be… drumroll CANADA???
Probably more like INDIA. Or they’ll call it the BEF (British Expeditionary Forces?) and lump 'em all together.
Can’t wait to see the ocean of tears from die-hard Axis players when they see a 100+ IPC consolidated US front on turn 3.
My guess is england and India. They’ll probably use the union Jack for the roundel on Europe
LOL, even if it’s NOT in the 100s as a combined income, what if its still in the 80s with NOs? Imagine building all planes and bombers for the first 3 rounds and seeing 24 fighters in moscow by the time the Germans get there. It’s crazy, man, I tell you. It’s just crazy.
And when you get your 24 planes in Moscow. I’d be happy to tell you that Pacific is LOST
I mean, you guys have played AA Pacific 40 right? You guys know how much the Allies need USA there right? So what happens if USA doesn’T do his job in Pacific? I think Asia will be lost quickly
Stop whining about consolidated income. It will increase the fun of the game and punish those who think they can put in 1 front only
Robert
yes but you can ignore asia the bigger threat will be in europe im sure
If UK has a split income, then Sea Lion may not be out of the question.
And when you get your 24 planes in Moscow. I’d be happy to tell you that Pacific is LOST
I mean, you guys have played AA Pacific 40 right? You guys know how much the Allies need USA there right? So what happens if USA doesn’T do his job in Pacific? I think Asia will be lost quickly
Stop whining about consolidated income. It will increase the fun of the game and punish those who think they can put in 1 front only
Robert
24 planes wrecking shop in the pacific on the way there could be entertaining for some. But, yeah, its not an option supposed to be taken seriously, I’m just suggesting doomsday unbalancing options with the new USA XTREEM COMBINED INCOME RULEZ.
We don’t even know what the combined rules are yet. Do we?
Can’t wait to see the ocean of tears from die-hard Axis players when they see a 100+ IPC consolidated US front on turn 3.
And I cannot imagine Japan players literally dying with mad laughs when fossile USA player tries ignorating a Super Sayajin level 4 Japan collecting also 100 IPCseach round. USA is not going to collect 100 if ignores Japan: convoy raiding, fancy invasions of America (north and south, neutrals are in game this time) with obscene amounts of resources, SBRs on WUSA maybe …
neutrals are worth money now? please tell me Switzerland has NO value
Why? you don’t think that neutral countries have resources?
they do…i just never really considered invading spain…Or any of the lesser neutrals like in south america
Invading Spain makes it easier to take out Gibraltar.
Neutrals in Pacific seem to have 0 ipc worth.
