I will not stand for NPB’s repeated use of coloured text!!! Take pity on us poor coloured blind folk!!!
I will not stand for NPB’s repeated use of coloured text!!! Take pity on us poor coloured blind folk!!!
Changed text color.
Your statements were clear. “No chance of holding Egypt past G1 w/o a bid.”
Which was absolutely wrong.
As to the rest of your post,
So touchy all of a sudden NPB? One little “extensive notes” jab and you throw a forum fit? I expected better.
But, rather than faking offense, or throwing fits, why not just say your first positions were somewhat overstated.
As another example, the allies might not move into Algeria with 4 transports if England is threatened with a c-sub transport buy. In which case Africa is “not lost” G2-G3.
Squirecam
Your statements were clear. “No chance of holding Egypt past G1 w/o a bid.”
Which was absolutely wrong.
As to the rest of your post,
So touchy all of a sudden NPB? One little “extensive notes” jab and you throw a forum fit? I expected better.
But, rather than faking offense, or throwing fits, why not just say your first positions were somewhat overstated.
As another example, the allies might not move into Algeria with 4 transports if England is threatened with a c-sub transport buy. In which case Africa is “not lost” G2-G3.
Squirecam
Get a load of this guy. Lol.
C-Sub German transport buy has its own drawbacks, not least of which it’s conditional on the Russian move. If you build a load of transports, the Allies can just do something ELSE. Oh wait, I said that already, and as usual you didn’t bother to read it. Ah ha ha ha! Here it is again:
if Germany does something outrageously silly and costly to prevent unification off Algeria, the Allies can exploit that instead. Your Platonic argument is not impressive, and does not support your empty assertions.
Baltic transports aren’t categorically wrong, but don’t say it’s a counter to Allied control of Africa. Don’t say you have a categorical answer when you don’t. The fact of the matter is, the Germans are greatly aided by the bid, and no matter of bluster on your part is going to make that untrue.
Again you skip the point of my listing the c-sub buy…to prevent an algerian allied merge. Which the buy generally does. AND WHAT YOU ASKED FOR WAS SUCH AN EXAMPLE !!
So the allies attack it. It’s meant to die…AND save africa income which it does. But this admiission was apparently to big for you to make…
Either your logic is flawed or you are deliberately obtuse. Either case, debating is pointless with you if you act in such a way.
Squirecam
If you really wanted to “debate”, I would be happy to do so, squirecam. But your accusations, misquotes, and insinuations are hardly a “debate”.
