no scrambles
L20 #1 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+7) BM3
-
@Amon-Sul said in L20 #1 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+7) BM3:
@trulpen said in L20 #1 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+7) BM3:
Thanks! You go ahead.
When I was looking at the board yesterday I counted that I would leave 1 inf behind in Hunan, but now I forgot about it. It was CM and can’t get any inf in there, so it is as it is.
but there is no NO for China that gives her 1 inf for every territory japan has in china empty. it was in vanilla, not in BM i think
The other way around.
-
Ah, I see that you already made the moves. Then Hunan is a non-issue. No worries.
-
@trulpen said in L20 #1 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+7) BM3:
You are on the move. I haven’t seen anything, but would like to contemplate if I should retreat to Hunan instead of Kwangsi. It’s probably not very good, but I’d like to check when I get home. Is that ok?
When I wrote this on my phone I didn’t see your game posts of China and UK. Wouldn’t have asked if I did.
-
u have to play italy, yes
-
@trulpen said in L20 #1 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+7) BM3:
@trulpen said in L20 #1 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+7) BM3:
You are on the move. I haven’t seen anything, but would like to contemplate if I should retreat to Hunan instead of Kwangsi. It’s probably not very good, but I’d like to check when I get home. Is that ok?
When I wrote this on my phone I didn’t see your game posts of China and UK. Wouldn’t have asked if I did.
yeah, uk post is weird since it includes usa , china and uk, and starting text is american, looks like american post
-
@trulpen said in L20 #1 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+7) BM3:
Ah, I see that you already made the moves. Then Hunan is a non-issue. No worries.
sorry for that, but now its too late. have not seen it on time. or maybe it was even written after my chinese played, probably did
-
Actually, it just didn’t show up for me. Something to do with cache.
-
Not to worry. It would probably just have been bad anyway.
-
@trulpen said in L20 #1 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+7) BM3:
@Amon-Sul said in L20 #1 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+7) BM3:
@trulpen said in L20 #1 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+7) BM3:
Thanks! You go ahead.
When I was looking at the board yesterday I counted that I would leave 1 inf behind in Hunan, but now I forgot about it. It was CM and can’t get any inf in there, so it is as it is.
but there is no NO for China that gives her 1 inf for every territory japan has in china empty. it was in vanilla, not in BM i think
The other way around.
are U 100 % sure about this?
why isnt it meantioned in the objectives then?
-
@trulpen said in L20 #1 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+7) BM3:
Actually, it just didn’t show up for me. Something to do with cache.
yeah refresh sometimes helps in that cases, but it should have be shown to u as a notification anyway
-
@Amon-Sul said in L20 #1 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+7) BM3:
@trulpen said in L20 #1 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+7) BM3:
@Amon-Sul said in L20 #1 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+7) BM3:
@trulpen said in L20 #1 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+7) BM3:
Thanks! You go ahead.
When I was looking at the board yesterday I counted that I would leave 1 inf behind in Hunan, but now I forgot about it. It was CM and can’t get any inf in there, so it is as it is.
but there is no NO for China that gives her 1 inf for every territory japan has in china empty. it was in vanilla, not in BM i think
The other way around.
are U 100 % sure about this?
why isnt it meantioned in the objectives then?
Yes, 100 %.
Maybe because it isn’t an objective, but rather an effect. It’s in the notes anyway.
-
@trulpen said in L20 #1 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+7) BM3:
@Amon-Sul said in L20 #1 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+7) BM3:
@trulpen said in L20 #1 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+7) BM3:
@Amon-Sul said in L20 #1 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+7) BM3:
@trulpen said in L20 #1 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+7) BM3:
Thanks! You go ahead.
When I was looking at the board yesterday I counted that I would leave 1 inf behind in Hunan, but now I forgot about it. It was CM and can’t get any inf in there, so it is as it is.
but there is no NO for China that gives her 1 inf for every territory japan has in china empty. it was in vanilla, not in BM i think
The other way around.
are U 100 % sure about this?
why isnt it meantioned in the objectives then?
Yes, 100 %.
Maybe because it isn’t an objective, but rather an effect. It’s in the notes anyway.
well i watched and there it is in the notes.
but i am playing a game against simon33, he has bunch of empty territories in china and i dont get inf there.
i am confused. i wrote him a message.
-
TripleA Turn Summary: Italians round 16
TripleA Turn Summary for game: World War II Global 1940 Balanced Mod3, version: 3.4
Game History
Round: 16 Combat Move - Italians Non Combat Move - Italians 2 artilleries, 4 infantry and 1 marine moved from Northern Italy to Western Germany 3 aaGuns moved from Northern Italy to Western Germany Turn Complete - Italians Total Cost from Convoy Blockades: 7 Rolling for Convoy Blockade Damage in 97 Sea Zone. Rolls: 2,6,5,4,2,4,3,6,2,2,2,2,3,5,6,6 Italians collect 0 PUs (7 lost to blockades); end with 0 PUs
Combat Hit Differential Summary :
-
its amazing. we play a game of 16 turns, and in the 16th turn i realize there exist some chinese guerilla fellows
LOOOOOL
hah
-
fast anzac coming
-
TripleA Turn Summary: ANZAC round 16
TripleA Turn Summary for game: World War II Global 1940 Balanced Mod3, version: 3.4
Game History
Round: 16 Purchase Units - ANZAC ANZAC buy 1 infantry, 1 submarine and 1 transport; Remaining resources: 0 PUs; Combat Move - ANZAC Non Combat Move - ANZAC 1 aaGun, 1 artillery, 1 fighter and 2 infantry moved from New South Wales to Queensland 1 destroyer moved from 26 Sea Zone to 25 Sea Zone 1 destroyer moved from 63 Sea Zone to 26 Sea Zone 1 destroyer moved from 62 Sea Zone to 54 Sea Zone Place Units - ANZAC 1 infantry placed in New South Wales 1 submarine and 1 transport placed in 62 Sea Zone Turn Complete - ANZAC ANZAC collect 10 PUs; end with 10 PUs Trigger ANZAC 1 Control Original And Malaya: ANZAC met a national objective for an additional 3 PUs; end with 13 PUs Objective ANZAC 3 Pacific Supply Lines: ANZAC met a national objective for an additional 3 PUs; end with 16 PUs
Combat Hit Differential Summary :
-
TripleA Turn Summary: French round 16
TripleA Turn Summary for game: World War II Global 1940 Balanced Mod3, version: 3.4
Game History
Round: 16 Purchase Units - ANZAC ANZAC buy 1 infantry, 1 submarine and 1 transport; Remaining resources: 0 PUs; Combat Move - ANZAC Non Combat Move - ANZAC 1 aaGun, 1 artillery, 1 fighter and 2 infantry moved from New South Wales to Queensland 1 destroyer moved from 26 Sea Zone to 25 Sea Zone 1 destroyer moved from 63 Sea Zone to 26 Sea Zone 1 destroyer moved from 62 Sea Zone to 54 Sea Zone Place Units - ANZAC 1 infantry placed in New South Wales 1 submarine and 1 transport placed in 62 Sea Zone Turn Complete - ANZAC ANZAC collect 10 PUs; end with 10 PUs Trigger ANZAC 1 Control Original And Malaya: ANZAC met a national objective for an additional 3 PUs; end with 13 PUs Objective ANZAC 3 Pacific Supply Lines: ANZAC met a national objective for an additional 3 PUs; end with 16 PUs Purchase Units - French French buy 1 armour, 1 infantry and 2 mech_infantrys; Remaining resources: 0 PUs; Combat Move - French 1 infantry moved from France to Switzerland French take Switzerland from Germans Combat - French Non Combat Move - French 1 aaGun and 2 infantry moved from Southern France to France 2 infantry moved from Turkey to Northwest Persia Place Units - French 1 infantry placed in Southern France 1 armour and 2 mech_infantrys placed in France Turn Complete - French French collect 19 PUs; end with 19 PUs
Combat Hit Differential Summary :
-
Germany on the move.
-
I must say that my subs in sz 97 are doin a great job. Even if U had 15 IPC there they would just destroy it xd
-
@Amon-Sul said in L20 #1 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+7) BM3:
@trulpen said in L20 #1 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+7) BM3:
@Amon-Sul said in L20 #1 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+7) BM3:
@trulpen said in L20 #1 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+7) BM3:
@Amon-Sul said in L20 #1 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+7) BM3:
@trulpen said in L20 #1 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+7) BM3:
Thanks! You go ahead.
When I was looking at the board yesterday I counted that I would leave 1 inf behind in Hunan, but now I forgot about it. It was CM and can’t get any inf in there, so it is as it is.
but there is no NO for China that gives her 1 inf for every territory japan has in china empty. it was in vanilla, not in BM i think
The other way around.
are U 100 % sure about this?
why isnt it meantioned in the objectives then?
Yes, 100 %.
Maybe because it isn’t an objective, but rather an effect. It’s in the notes anyway.
well i watched and there it is in the notes.
but i am playing a game against simon33, he has bunch of empty territories in china and i dont get inf there.
i am confused. i wrote him a message.
he has a bunch of costal territories, and non coastal now in this turn, but china hasnt come to play yet. that is what confused me it seems.