Session Report with Focus on Balance Issues


  • Session Report:  Axis & Allies 1941

    Overview

    I got my copy from Amazon last week, and I played a solo session to test the balance of the game, having seen a lot of suggestions that that game was biased toward the Axis.  My analysis after this multi-day solo playtest is that the Axis are in better position in 1941 than in perhaps any other version of the game, but I don’t think that the game is broken or severely out of balance in favor of the Axis.  In fact, the Allies won in my playtest (according to my assessment since the official victory conditions were still not met after eight turns).  The way I see things is that the Axis have the initiative in the early stages of the game and can expand rapidly to achieve economic parity with Allies.  However, if the Allies play defensively and smartly, they can hang on to their capitals (including Moscow) and begin to push back the Axis tide as they are now spread out and unable to defend their entire lines.  The Axis are not done, however, at this point, because they are still powerful enough to win if the Allies make any mistakes or just get unlucky.  Of course, bad luck can play a role with the paucity of total units in this version of the game.  Japan had some terrible luck in the game when their attack on the US Pacific fleet ended in disaster when they had a significant numerical advantage.  Given the US’s decision to focus on Europe, this was big moment in the war.  Although time will truly tell, my guess is that there will be great replayability in the game.

    Turn-by-Turn Summary

    This is my recollection of the turn by turn action, could be off a bit esp. with last couple of turns, but I think this is basically correct summary.

    Turn One:  USSR counter-attacks into West Russia with larger force; Germany decimates British navy, swings around and takes Caucasus, UK begins rebuilding; Japan takes Philippines, Borneo, China; USA prepares for Germany first strategy, retreats transport from West Coast.

    Turn Two:  USSR recaptures Caucasus; Germany takes Egypt and West Russia; UK reconstitutes navy with Aircraft Carrier build, flies fighters to Moscow; Japan takes East Indies and Australia, Siberia; USA continues building for invasion of Europe, lands two fighters on British AC.

    Turn Three:  USSR falls back to Moscow for total defense of capital; Germany takes Caucasus, moves more units to West Russia; UK girds for defense of India, readies for Turn Four Invasion of Europe; Japan takes India, more of Asia; USA lands in North Africa with 5 infantry, 3 tanks; sends bomber and one fighter to defend Moscow.

    Turn Four:  USSR builds up for defense of Moscow; Germany opts not to invade Moscow, retakes Caucasus while leaving enough troops in place to threaten Moscow; UK takes Western Europe;  Japan takes Middle East and South Africa; USA takes Southern Europe and Egypt.

    Turn Five:  USSR continues to build up defenses; Germany retakes Western Europe and Southern Europe; UK rebuilds for new invasion; Japan moves units into Caucasus to support Germany, takes Hawaii; USA retakes South Africa, retakes Middle East, defends West Coast, prepares for second invasion fleet.

    Turn Six:  USSR continues to defend; Germany prepares for second invasion of Moscow; UK lands forces in North Africa; Japan continues to put units into Caucasus, had disastrous sea battle with US navy in Pacific; USA lands second invasion force in North Africa.

    Turn Seven:  USSR attack Caucaus all out, inflicts damage, retreats back to Moscow; Germany moves closer to Moscow for final attempt; UK invades Norway; Japan retakes Middle East, builds up India; USA to Egypt for attack on Middle East, begins preparation for third invasion fleet.

    Turn Eight:  USSR defends; Germany makes all out attack on Moscow with 40% chance of taking capital (according to D.S. Kelly’s calculator) but fails, Axis now doomed; UK takes Eastern Europe; Japan moves units to defend India, counter attack Middle East; USA takes Middle East.  Axis concede.  Allies win.

    Final Economic Situation
    Allies:  31 (down 5 from start)
    Axis 27 (up 5 form start but down 2 from high water mark of 29)

    USSR (7):  Karelia, Archangel, Russia, Caucasus.
    Germany (10):  down for Norway and Eastern Europe.
    UK (9):  up for Norway, Eastern Europe; down for Australia, Borneo, East Europe, India.
    Japan (17):  up for India, Australia, Borneo, East Europe, China, Phillipines, Hawaii.
    USA (15):  down for Phillipines, Hawaii.


  • Session Report #2:  Axis & Allies 1941

    Overview

    I had time for another solo playtest and this one went much quicker than first one, ending on Turn Four with Axis victory.  There were a few variations in my play this time.  In general, I experimented with both sides being a bit more aggressive.  This led to more swings of luck in the game, and they tended to favor the Axis this time.  The battle for Moscow that sealed Axis victory was a 50/50 affair according to the dice calculator, but the dice helped Germany to a comfortable victory.  UK retook Moscow, but with just a single tank, and Japan followed by re-taking Moscow for the Axis.  Just as bad for the Allies, a lone German sub had sunk a US destroyer and the three transports it was guarding.  Disaster!  I continue to feel that the game is fairly well balanced, but the dice can alter this balance pretty easily.  This is fine with me in theory, but we will see in practice how I handle the bad dice in this game!

  • Sponsor '17 TripleA '11 '10

    Do you play with the victory condition of one capitol or two?

  • TripleA

    y u attack wid russia?


  • Do you play with the victory condition of one capitol or two?

    I was playing with the one victory city condition.

    y u attack wid russia?

    My thinking was that a very strong attack on West Russia would force Germany into all out attack on the Russian stack, forcing them to leave UK navy somewhat intact, or deter them from such an attack, leaving the USSR with an extra IPC and a buffer territory for a little bit.  I still think this is viable strategy, but if the German player gets very lucky with their rolls (in my second game, their three defending infantry got three hits), this makes it possible for German player to counter attack without throwing in all of their Lutfwaffe, which is not good at all for Allies.

  • TripleA

    oh I just shuffle with uk.


  • The Russian attack may indeed be too aggressive.  The Germans actually don’t need all of their airpower to take out the British navy, which seems ahistorical to me.  In any event, this means that they are pretty free to counter-attack the Russian stack.  So, Cow is probably right that this is sub-optimal strategy.


  • I completed a third solo playtest of the game, and the game was again very close. This time the game went for quite a while, at least 10 turns, and ended with Axis victory as they finally secured Moscow.  This was no doubt due to mistakes by Allies who moved too many of their fighters from Moscow to reinforce a significant landing in Western Europe.  The Germans gambled that the depleted Russians would fall against an all out attack, and they were correct, just barely taking territory. If they had failed, the Axis would have been in great trouble since they chose not to counter-attack the Allied landing.  The Axis had been close to winning earlier in the game and seemed to possess the initiative and strength throughout.  If the Allies are to win the game in a short period of time in 1941, the Axis must make mistakes and/or have bad luck.  Otherwise, I think it will take a long, long time for the Allies to capture either of the Axis capitals.  This does not mean I think the game is unbalanced. Quite the opposite, this seems as balanced as any game of Axis & Allies I have played, though I think it tilts more Axis than earlier editions.

  • Sponsor '17 TripleA '11 '10

    I think we’ve been misreading the “Optional Shorter Game” victory conditions! Look on both pages 6 & 21. The short games requires the capture of London or Washington, NOT MOSCOW! This makes a much more balanced effort. It also says the Axis capital must be held until the end of the Japanese turn, or the Allied capital until the end of the USA turn…

  • TripleA '12

    I’ve been playing this one solo as well. It’s round 4, Japan has just taken India, Germany is struggling to build enough units to take Russia out, UK has control of Africa, US is still building fleets. Seems pretty balanced so far and I can’t wait to play against my friend next week. I have supplemented my own plastic chips and paper money (not that you really need it with so little IPCs in this game). All I can see so far is that I like this game a lot!  :-)

    I understand that the US should start at 17 IPCs but this seems like a lot more compared to everyone else, but there you go. I think 15 would have been fairer…

  • Sponsor '17 TripleA '11 '10

    I think US at 17 is fair for balance reasons. They have to go at least a little Pacific strat and have a lot of ground to make up on the IJN, especially after the battleship is sunk J1.

Suggested Topics

  • 3
  • 6
  • 7
  • 3
  • 10
  • 10
  • 19
  • 52
Axis & Allies Boardgaming Custom Painted Miniatures

122

Online

17.3k

Users

39.9k

Topics

1.7m

Posts