Conflict of heros

Hi everyone!

It appears there were a few misprints and missed updates in the files on the Game Crafter site. Apologies to those who have purchased this game prior to today.

**Here is a list of errata and clarifications from any copies purchased prior to 23/08/2021:

ERRATA

CONTROL AND ROUND TRACKER MAT ARVN Starting Production Points should be 22, not 23. PARU Starting Production Points should be 13, not 23.

2) GAME BOARD/MAP

US Control Markers missing from the following territories;
** Bankok, Nkhon Phanom, Ubon Ratachathani. PARU Control Markers missing from all Thailand territories. ARVN Control Marker missing from Sadec. Country names missing.

3) RULE BOOK

Page 2: Armored Personnell Carriers are NOT in game (removed from components list). Page 7: Special Unit Rules and Placements: ARVN - “New ARVN units are placed in Saigon. If Saigon is controlled by Communist forces, ARVN may not place new units.” Page 7: Units and their Values: “*Helicopters are available to purchase by the US and ARVN player powers only.” Page 8: ANZUS: Anzus units deploy in Saigon, or if Saigon is controlled by Communist forces, Dixie Station. Page 11: Special Political Rules and Effects: Anti Communist Forces: The Silent War (Cambodia and Laos): add to first line “(Units starting the game in these territories do not count unless they move and remain in Cambodia or Laos)” Page 13: Bombers: “You may not conduct bombing on any territory you control” Page 13: Bombers: Bombing the Ho Chi Minh Trail: “Bombing the Ho Chi Minh Trail is not considered invading and therefore does not allow the VC player to gain additional troops”

CLARIFICATIONS

Can Covert units move on the covert map?

No, covert troops remain in place. If they move, they are no longer covert and must be placed on the main board.

PARU has units starting the game on the Ho Chi Minh Trail. Are those territories US owned at the start of the game?

Those territories begin the game as ‘contested’/occupied and not controlled. If the Communist forces do not take them by the end of the first round and PARU or other Anti Communist forces remain, they will be controlled by the US (or other Anti Communist force).

He posted in the correct forum: other games. What exactly is the issue here?

@IWillNeverGrowUp:

@John:

Looks to be an awesome game. :-D

Thanks. This has been an on and off again project for about 8 years now but over the past year I’ve really started to make serious headway into giving it a facelift. The mechanics are sound (very A&A based with some little modifications here and there) and we’re going to give out a couple play test copies to some hardcore A&A groups to see if they can break it for us.

Cliffside Bunker has been promised play test copy #1 … soon!

Awesome can’t wait to see the gameplay. :-)

this game is fun but when you get vehicles tanks and all infantry is useless almost besides taking points

attorney help

Prefer company of heroes 1, because COH2 takes away too much stuff, and gives not enough back, and seems no different in terms of graphics and gameplay from COH1, so What has COH2 given us, apart from Russians, and general characters? Nothing, less units, less factions, same graphics, The game failed. :-(

attorney help

@Imperious:

They could never make Moral 41 with plastic. It would take 1,500 pieces to get a playable game. It has alot of different types of units. The ceramic tiles represent various raw materials for war effort…i do mean alot.

The plastic, as you probably know, is pretty cheap once you get the molds and if you have a big wallet for a big run. That’s at least what I’ve heard. I want to like smaller run games but to be honest this game seemed boring and the parts look horrible printed emblems on them would’ve made it look more appealing.

They probably should’ve made a home-brew video game with this.

Has anyone played either of the games in the Conflict of Heroes series? If so, what do you think of the game play compared to the A&A series?

use to have