2nd edition?

@kaufschtick:

@Dylan:

Well if you get Europe 40, the game won’t be broken
:-o shocking I know.

Europe doesn’t change a thing if you want to play Pacific as a stand alone. :?

There were some quotes from Larry in another thread on here, that someone took from the Harris website. They indicated that all along Pacific was intended from the begining to be a stand alone game.

Granted the Global game will be fun (I hope), there was the strong appeal for me that with the two games, there were going to actually be three games to have the option of playing, depending on time and what mood the players were in.

Not to knock the Europe game, but it has no bearing as far as I’m concerned, on the Pacific game.

I agrre with kaufschitick. Pacific was designed to be combined or alone.

The problem with this is that WWII was……A WORLD WAR! Tough to simulate a section like pacific when there is no threat from Russia that forced Jap troops to stay in Manchuria. I bet you anything that when we get the global setup just take Russian troops and station them in territories in the East and I bet that would go a long way to balancing the game.

White has an advantage in chess, too.  Doesn’t make it a crappy game.

However, a chess board where squares connected to squares they weren’t supposed to?  And only comes with thirteen pawns?  That’s kinda crappy.