Iraq is a political subject.
Iraq, again
-
Theres a difference between News and Debate shows. Sean Hannity and Rush are debaters, they don’t give you facts. I don’t go to Donahue for news. I go to the newspaper.
The newspaper? They’ve got just as big an agenda to push as the other two guys. Only theirs is usually slanted left.
You want uninhibited news?…go to the internet.
-
Oh, and everything you see on the internet is true. I read the Washington Post, which I find to be a fairly objective newspaper.
-
cystic- right, I kind of left the iraq string and was commenting about the isreali vs palestinian thing yanni and emu god had going there. sorry if my normal nonsensical babble became even more of a mess there.
besides what do we need canada for, we’ve already stolen most of your hockey teams and all the best players (only using this to lighten the mood). :lol:I believe the inspector did indeed refer to the french man as a “french government attache”… does his radio show have transcripts? in either case the point was that the weapons inspection/destruction program was compromised and was there fore ineffective in finding and removing these weapons which we knew to exist.
hey guys I finally found the spell checker. know I can spell my english almost as well as you foreigners! :wink:
-
Might have a transcript, where to find it I don’t know. But I clearly remember him saying he was a French Businessman working as a specialist (in consulting maybe) with the inspectors, and not a member of the French Government.
-
@Deviant:Scripter:
The newspaper? They’ve got just as big an agenda to push as the other two guys. Only theirs is usually slanted left.
yeah, many of the big newspapers are clearly slanted to the left, such as the washington post. thats why my parents get the washington times… it actually tells you the news, it doesn’t just trash conservatives
-
I found this essay, while not very good, is something you guys might find interesting:
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/next/134624183_next-prowar02.html
-
yeah, many of the big newspapers are clearly slanted to the left, such as the washington post. thats why my parents get the washington times… it actually tells you the news, it doesn’t just trash conservatives
Look past the Editorials page and you’ll find news :)
-
here’s an example of 'news" from the washington post : all conservatives are racist (see more on pg 12) liberals are so awesome, you want to vote for them in the next election (more on pg7) conservatives are really stupid (see more on pg3)
-
:lol:
this kids great! -
here’s an example of 'news" from the washington post : all conservatives are racist (see more on pg 12) liberals are so awesome, you want to vote for them in the next election (more on pg7) conservatives are really stupid (see more on pg3)
ahhh . . . the whining hyperbole of an ultra-conservative whiner.
Although not thoroughly versed in American newspapers, the Washington Post appeared fairly middleground to conservative, particular in its support of Bush and his little Iraq ideas . . . . -
@cystic:
Although not thoroughly versed in American newspapers, the Washington Post appeared fairly middleground to conservative, particular in its support of Bush and his little Iraq ideas . . . .
you want a middleground paper? read the LA times, or the Washington times. the post is so liberal it isn’t funny. where exactly did you get the idea that they support the war in Iraq? i’m just curious… maybe you got confused with the washington TIMES, beacuse that supports the war in Iraq and its middleground, but the post is totally a bucket of crap.
-
Read their editorials :) At least half are either a) Complaining about the Anti-War protests or b) Pushing for Iraq.
-
sure, they have several conservative editorial columnists, but this comes NOWHERE close to matching up to all the liberal crap they have in the pages preceeding the editorial sections.
-
400 posts! here i come TG Moses! :P
CC edit - Strongbad, you know these are inappropriate.
Yanny Edit - What he said. Don’t do it again.
-
Leftish slants can be explained easily; silly idealists want to become journalists.
-
F_ALK- I’m starting to like arguing with you. not even yanni disagrees with me as much as you do. Buddy I’m not a racist. that card gets thrown around whenever someone says anything remotly conservative around here.
Well, maybe it was just a reply to your commie accusations. As well, i can’t recall that i really called you a racist, i merely pointed out that noone is as perfect as he thinks to be: a lot of prejudices can be interpreted as hidden racism.
but to be racist I’d have to have it out for another group of people based on an attribute that I can easily Identify (race color whatever) and I don’t.
The point is: you don’t need something that makes them easily identifable.
The german jews in the 1920’s and 30’s were not different from the german non-jews. You couldn’t identify them unless you waited in front of their temple to see who is going in. The very very very vast majority was secular, maybe the only only way to identify some was the butchers, but not more. Still, they were targeted by the worst “racism” the world has ever seen.notice you say the “never proven Iraq Al Quaeda” collaberation theory-
the president has said he has info linking saddam to al quaeda, and he plans to release more intell. on this through powell on feb 5th. does he have to compromise his sources and get people killed to show you personally proof? I personally feel that once we go in, we’ll find the weapons we want and the proof you need.US intelligence agencies have failed often enough not to risk a war. Especially, when it has to appear that the often mentioned proof is not existing.
I think the whole debate that the country’s going thru over Iraq is a result of how stupid we really are. for example- had bush not procrastinated and just started bombing Iraq- or even invaded, people may have grumbled but accepted it.
I can’t speak for the US people, but i am pretty sure that the world would not have accepted that.
-
F_alk- what kind of taxes do you pay there now? I pay somewhere between 36-45% of my income in taxes. it’s hard to say because it is hidden taxes here.
…Oh if that "can’t work Shouldn’t survive thing made you mad - try this:
-If you Don’t Pay Taxes - you shouldn’t have a right to vote - especially on tax increases.
…
I wasn’t born a right wing devil- the world and all it’s scum made me this way.The income tax rates here, with social and health insurances, are higher:
Icome tax can be up to 47%; health insurance is about 15%, social security are about 25%, the later have an upper limit, anything above that is not taxed.
Of course: the richer you are, the better your accountants to find loopholes and avoid these rates.Some interesting points in germany:
In the 70’s the governments tax income was 30% of workers and employees income-tax, and 30% of taxing wealth and cooperations.
Today, it’s 35% by workers and employees, and 15% by wealth and cooperations.
From that i deduct that you would strongly favor the german rich not to vote :)……I belive you were not born right wing… but you fell for the right wing propaganda of “whose fault” it is.
If you have a look here, you can see that in the 90’s the social support for the “lowest third of incomes” decreased, while it was increased for the highest third (now proportionally being higher than in the UK, France or Denmark).
Some time ago, a CEO had 20 times the income of a qualified worker, today it is a factor of 300!!! Between 1995 and 2000, the CEOs had an average raise in their income of 300%, compared to 10% for their workers. And the ones that are classified “poor” are usually long-time jobless (not saying anything about whose fault it is that they are),
single working mothers and families with more than 2 kids !!Whoever says that the economy is suffering… should first have a look where the money went in the times when it did not suffer !!
-
oh and F_alk- how could you use gen paulus as an example. he was a trophy.
Any general was a trophy…. and generals treated each other well, because they knew that they could lose the next battle and go into captivity… then it’s better when you have a “gentlemans agreement”.
-
gassing the kurds was just his way of expressing his feelings.
The US didn’t say anything the time it happened. Saddam was a too important ally at that time.
-
It is cold blooded murder to fire a missle into a residential area, killing 1 terrorist and 26 innocents. It is cold blooded murder to fire a bomb at a car in the street, killing 1 terrorist and almost a dozen people just driving by. In the US, had a commander ordered those attacks, he/she’d be put in jail, possible given the death penalty.
Unless it was a retaliation action by the army…… which have about the same results…