I get to be the Axis in my next game, and I’ve been mulling over a Japan strategy in my head.
It requires that I dedicate just under half my starting income (1 tranny + 2 inf) every turn against the US. It also requires a J1 IC build in mainland Asia.
Turn 1, I build the IC (probably in Kwantung), 1 tranny and 2 inf.
My combat moves should be to take China, and do my damnedest to destroy both the US and British Fleets. (assuming the Brits haven’t moved out) taking Hawaii, while difficult, is in the realm of possibility.
Now, it almost goes without saying that the other half of my income after turn 1 will be dedicated to tanks in mainland Asia to put the pressure on Russia and possibly take India.
EVERY turn, however, I will be building a tranny and 2 inf. These will be sent piecemeal towards the US. While it is entirely likely that I might lose some to aircraft or naval action, it will force the US to protect itself, rather than attempting to help Britain and Russia against Germany. While 2 inf are unlikely to hold anything for long, if I keep my transports spread out, utilize my fleet effectively, and keep a steady stream of transports heading for the US west coast, I can keep the US focused entirely on Japan.
I am certain I can kill Russia and Britain with just Germany, provided the Japanese can use those tanks effectively to stab Russia in the back. The question is, can this strategy keep the US from aiding in Europe, or will this be a big waste of money that will result in my utter defeat?